Haitian illegal aliens crossing the Rio Grande, Veronica G. Cardenas for the New York Times
Strangers No Longer is a Socialist Document
“Migrant crisis has US taxpayers on the hook for up to $451B, House GOP report says.”[1] That’s a real headline in the New York Post from November 2023.
According to the article,
Americans could pay up to $451 billion to care for migrants who entered the US illegally, but have been released into the country or escaped from custody, according to a new report due out Monday from House Republicans and obtained exclusively by The Post…
Compiled from federal and state records, media reports and other public information, the 50-page document outlines the taxpayer costs incurred in medical care, housing, education and other welfare benefits for tens of millions of migrants — to say nothing of the additional costs for law enforcement.
One could argue that this report is biased in that it was put out by the GOP while a Democrat was in the White House.
The Post article cites another study by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) claiming that “federal, state, and local costs of illegal immigration amount to around $182 billion annually—with aliens defraying just $31 billion of that cost in tax revenue.” That means American taxpayers are on the hook for $151 billion.
Topics: Pope Francis says it’s a sin to reject welfare migrants, a liberal woman minister joins Kamala Harris’ campaign staff, Australian Zionists try to shut down criticism of Israel.
My Comments: A hard hitting article on the destructive immigration policies of the the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State. Catholic Charities is doing the work of their father below, the devil.
Terrace Park Cemetery in Holtville, CA, where the remains of numerous, unidentified illegal aliens are buried. These individuals died in the desert attempting to avoid detection by U.S. border authorities.
If you read Roman Catholic immigration material long enough, you’ll eventually come across a story about commemorating migrants who die while attempting to illegally enter the United States.
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) posted another such story on their X feed last week titled “At burial ground for unidentified migrants, sisters pray for the dead.” Apart from the obvious doctrinal error of praying for the dead, there is another problem that takes a bit more work to unravel. I’m referring to the problem of the migrant deaths themselves.
The implicit intent of these stories is to shift the blame for the death of the migrants from the treasonous activities of the Roman Catholic Church-State (RCCS) to the American people and their elected representatives.
“What freedom could the Pope be talking about,” I wondered. Freedom not to have my nation overrun by welfare migrants? Freedom not to be forced to pay for the housing, medical care, schooling, food, and a thousand other things for foreigners and illegal aliens? Freedom not to have children born in my country to illegal aliens declared instant American citizens with all the benefits thereof? Freedom not to have a replacement migration scheme run on the American people? Freedom not to be lectured by His Holiness (sic) and his lackeys about how I’m a bad person because I oppose having my land, as Isaiah put it, devoured by strangers?
No. Very obviously, the Papal Antichrist meant none of those things. The job of Antichrist is the to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. That’s how he rolls and he cannot do otherwise.
What Pope Francis meant by freedom is that migrants should be “free to choose whether to migrate or to stay.”
Those of us who are a bit older may remember a series on PBS some 40-odd years ago called “Free to Choose.” It was a series put out by Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Freidman in defense of capitalism.
But Pope Francis, good socialist that he is, does not much care for capitalism, the system of free enterprise and private property found in the Bible. By “free to choose,” the Pope means that migrants are free to barge into your country and force you to pay to support them. And in Rome’s twisted way of thinking, it is your bounden duty to support them. Your “obligation” as various Roman Catholic prelates like to put it.
This supposed obligation to support migrants is a lie promoted by Rome to subvert independent nation-states and to further its own interests, chief among them the promotion of New World Order globalism. Although it may surprise some people to hear this, the Vatican, not the World Economic Forum, not the Bilderbergers, and not Bill Gates, is the beating heart of globalism. The Vatican has long used migration as a battering ram to undermine the relatively free and prosperous societies of the West – the relative freedom and prosperity of the West is the remnant of the 16th century Christian Reformation – and to bring them back under its sway, sway that was lost at the time of the Reformation and the ensuing Thirty Years’ War.
According to the article, “Pope Francis pointed out that the Holy Family’s flight into Egypt was not a free decision. This is the case with many migrants.”
Nancy Pelosi pays a visit to her boss, Pope Francis, for a private audience, on October 9, 2021. (CNS/Vatican Media)
And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders.
2 Thessalonians 2:8-9
It was on March 13, 2013, that Jorge Bergoglio of Argentina was elected Pope, taking the name Francis I. Francis’s election was notable for several reasons. First, his predecessor, Benedict the XVI, had just left office, becoming the first Pope in 600 years to resign.
Second, Bergoglio was the first Pope to take the name Francis, after St. Francis of Assisi. Assisi, according to Pope Francis, “‘was the man of poverty, the man of peace, the man who loves and protects creation, the same created world ‘with which we don’t have such a good relationship.’” This is significant because Francis has aggressively pushed globalism under the aegis of care for the environment. An example of this can be seen in his 2015 encyclical Laudato Siˊ. In this letter, Francis, “commands the nations to confess their collective sins of exploiting the environment with capitalism.” He also noted, “there is an urgent need of a true world political authority,” to ensure conformity with his call for globalist environmentalism.
Third, Francis is the first Jesuit Pope. This is not a small thing, as the Jesuits have a well-earned reputation for dishonesty, subversion, and murder that has gotten the order kicked out of many nations over the centuries and even officially suppressed by Pope Clement XIV. It was Bergoglio’s Jesuit background that caused former Roman Catholic Priest turned Protestant Evangelist Richard Bennett to call Francis the most dangerous Pope we’ve faced in our lifetime.
Many people, both Christian and non-Christian, would agree that the past several years have seen a rise in many dangerous, anti-liberty trends and that those trends seem to be intensifying and not abating. While these trends did not begin with Francis’s pontificate, they have certainly grown stronger since he took office. Is it possible that there is a connection between the pernicious social, political, and economic trends we’ve seen over the past 10 years and the rise of this Jesuit Pope? In my opinion, I believe there is a connection. Let’s look at the evidence.
A group of migrants from Venezuela planned their next steps at the Downtown El Paso Greyhound station after they were released to the streets as part of an effort by the Border Patrol to control the population at its El Paso Central Processing Center. The men gave their consent to be photographed. (Cindy Ramirez/El Paso Matters)
In his book Ecclesiastical Megalomania: the Economic and Political Thought of the Roman Catholic Church, John Robbins argued that the Thomistic principle of the universal destination of all goods is so important in Catholic thought that all rights are subject to it. (Robbins, 1999)
This principle, the universal destination of all goods, is the idea that when God created the world, he gave it to man collectively. Robbins calls the universal destination of goods “original communism.”
One of the implications of the doctrine of the universal destination of all goods is that property rights are not absolute but can be overridden by other concerns. In Rome’s social teaching, need is the ultimate factor in determining rightful ownership. John Robbins explains it this way, according to Rome, “Whoever needs property ought to possess it. Need makes another’s goods one’s own. Need is the ultimate and only moral title to property.” (Robbins, 1999)
The Roman Church-State is fine with private property up to a point, but when things get serious, need is all that matters. If your neighbor needs something, and you have a surplus of what he needs, he can take it, and it’s neither a sin nor a crime for him to do so.
Robbins quotes Pope Paul VI writing in his encyclical On the Progress of Peoples:
…each man has therefore the right to find in the world what is necessary for himself. The recent Council [Vatican II] reminded us of this: “God intended the earth and all that it contains for the use of every human being and people. Thus, as all men follow justice and unite in charity, created goods should abound for them on a reasonable basis.” All other rights whatsoever, including those of property and of free commerce, are to be subordinated to this principle. (Robbins, 1999)
[W]here the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty
– 2 Corinthians 3:17
“Pope Francis: Climate Change Has Become An ‘Emergency’” ran the Breitbart headline from last Thursday, July 14. The occasion for this story was, “Pope Francis instruct[ing] the Holy See to sign onto the 2015 Paris Climate Accord.”
The Paris Climate Accord, a globalist power grab designed to strip citizens of their political and economic liberties in the name of stopping climate change, is one of many hoaxes used by globalists, including the Antichrist papacy, to destroy what remains of the Protestant Westphalian World Order (WWO) and to promote socialism and global government.
Not wanting Jorge Bergoglio (aka Francis I) to have all the fun, the very next day Joe Biden, America’s second Roman Catholic president, declared that he will move forward with his own initiatives to combat climate change and curb greenhouse gas emissions.
According to this article from CNBC, Biden made his remarks, “a day after Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., told Democratic leadership that he won’t support the climate provisions in the reconciliation bill.”
Note that CNBC said nothing about Biden’s remarks following the Pope’s. No, that would let the cat out of the bag. Biden’s remarks were following Joe Manchin’s refusal to support “climate provisions.”
Just as the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century freed men from the spiritual tyranny of the Roman Catholic Church-State, so did it liberate them from Rome’s political and economic tyranny.
But the past 131 years have seen a steady decrease in political and economic liberty and a concomitant rise in Roman Catholic authoritarianism.
The Borg, a recurring antagonist in Star Trek the Next Generation, was a group of cyborgs linked in a hive mind called “the Collective.” The Wikipedia entry on the Borg tells us that the goal of the Borg was to absorb the technology and knowledge of other species through the process of assimilation with the ultimate aim of achieving perfection.
One could think of the Borg as the ultimate expression of collectivism, an idea that stands in opposition to the historic western, Protestant idea of individualism, which can be defined as “a doctrine that the interests of the individual are or ought to be ethically paramount” (Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary).
Lux Lucet 