Joe Biden blames you for the raft of gun violence in America and not his own destructive policies.
Jesuit Joe was up to his old tricks late last week, this time proclaiming his love for “commonsense gun reform.”
So what does Joe consider “commonsense” (sic) gun reform? He tells us.
Ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines
Strengthen background checks
Enact safe storage laws and red flag laws
Repeal the immunity that protects gun manufacturers from liability
Address the mental health crisis deepened by the trauma of gun violence
It’s tempting to ask Joe how he knows these things are “commonsense,” but I doubt he’d be able to give a coherent reason. At any rate, let’s do a quick run-through of his proposals.
Ban Assault Weapons
What is an assault weapon? Joe doesn’t tell us and neither do the other gun banners. I say gun banners because that is what they want to do: legally bar Americans from owning firearms. Don’t think for a minute that this is just about “assault weapons,” whatever those are, and not about the Second Amendment more broadly.
They’re coming for your handguns, your shotguns, and your 22 rifles as well.
Same with the term “high-capacity magazine.” What does Biden consider a high-capacity magazine? I guess we’ll find out. My guess is that ultimately, Biden would consider anything greater than zero to be a high-capacity magazine.
The Biden administration announced a plan to fight antisemitism. Credit…Tom Brenner for The New York Times
It’s truly surprising how much Western governments hate their own people.
It sounds strange to say it. But it’s true almost without exception.
The Canadian government hates Canadians. The British government hates the British. Just as Germany’s government holds its own people in contempt. France likewise.
America is no exception to this rule. The Democrats have expressed their hatred of the American people and in particular the historic core population of this nation, white Protestants, for as long as I can remember. But it’s not just Democrats. Much of the conservative and Republican establishment couldn’t wait to denounce their own voters during the George Floyd riots in the summer of 2020.
From my observation, Hungary’s Calvinist Prime Minister Viktor Orban is the only exception to this rule. As he wrote in a tweet in March of this year, “We respect and help the Ukrainians. There is one thing we won’t do: to put their interests ahead of ours. As Prime Minister of Hungary, I am responsible for the Hungarian nation. Therefore we will always put Hungary first! This is my moral compass.”
If only America had a government that defended the interests of Americans the same way! Instead, we have a government that actively hates the historic core population of America. Stolen elections have consequences. Having a government that hates and fears its own people is one of those consequences.
Indeed, we have Joe Biden who clearly hates a significant part, perhaps even a majority, of the American people. In this regard, he’s merely picking up where Barak Obama, who spoke of small-town Americans bitterly clinging to their guns and religion, and Hillary Clinton, of the notorious “basket of deplorables” comment, left off.
“What freedom could the Pope be talking about,” I wondered. Freedom not to have my nation overrun by welfare migrants? Freedom not to be forced to pay for the housing, medical care, schooling, food, and a thousand other things for foreigners and illegal aliens? Freedom not to have children born in my country to illegal aliens declared instant American citizens with all the benefits thereof? Freedom not to have a replacement migration scheme run on the American people? Freedom not to be lectured by His Holiness (sic) and his lackeys about how I’m a bad person because I oppose having my land, as Isaiah put it, devoured by strangers?
No. Very obviously, the Papal Antichrist meant none of those things. The job of Antichrist is the to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. That’s how he rolls and he cannot do otherwise.
What Pope Francis meant by freedom is that migrants should be “free to choose whether to migrate or to stay.”
Those of us who are a bit older may remember a series on PBS some 40-odd years ago called “Free to Choose.” It was a series put out by Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Freidman in defense of capitalism.
But Pope Francis, good socialist that he is, does not much care for capitalism, the system of free enterprise and private property found in the Bible. By “free to choose,” the Pope means that migrants are free to barge into your country and force you to pay to support them. And in Rome’s twisted way of thinking, it is your bounden duty to support them. Your “obligation” as various Roman Catholic prelates like to put it.
This supposed obligation to support migrants is a lie promoted by Rome to subvert independent nation-states and to further its own interests, chief among them the promotion of New World Order globalism. Although it may surprise some people to hear this, the Vatican, not the World Economic Forum, not the Bilderbergers, and not Bill Gates, is the beating heart of globalism. The Vatican has long used migration as a battering ram to undermine the relatively free and prosperous societies of the West – the relative freedom and prosperity of the West is the remnant of the 16th century Christian Reformation – and to bring them back under its sway, sway that was lost at the time of the Reformation and the ensuing Thirty Years’ War.
According to the article, “Pope Francis pointed out that the Holy Family’s flight into Egypt was not a free decision. This is the case with many migrants.”
The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy.
John 10:10
EL PASO, TEXAS – In an aerial view, immigrants line up to be processed to make asylum claims at a makeshift migrant camp on May 11, 2023, in El Paso, Texas. The number of illegal aliens reaching the border has surged with the end of the U.S. government’s Covid-era Title 42 policy, which for the past three years has allowed for the quick expulsion of illegal aliens entering the country. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images).
Last week witnessed the end of Title 42, the Coved-era rule put in place by the Trump Administration allowing for expedited deportation of illegal aliens. Predictably, a tidal wave of illegal aliens gathered on America’s southern border in the weeks leading up to the end of Title 42 on May 11, and this group has now swarmed the border. See here, here, here, for videos of illegal aliens rushing the border in the days leading up to May 11.
Some people have described this influx of illegal aliens over the past 2 plus years under the Biden Regime as the “failure” of Biden’s border policy. For example, a recent piece in the New York Post described El Paso, TX as “the latest ground zero for President Joe Biden’s failed border policies.” But Biden’s border policies can be considered a failure only if one supposes they were designed to protect the property, lives, and communities of the American people.
But there’s no reason to believe this is the case. In my opinion, the entire purpose of Biden’s border policies has been to create the very situation that has unfolded over the past 2-plus years. The illegal alien invasion is the policy. And that policy is the original with the Biden Regime. As this blog has contended for many years, the illegal alien assault on America is a creature of the Vatican. The Roman Catholic, Jesuit-influenced Joe Biden and his administration are merely carrying out in practice the welfare immigration of the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State.
Why does Rome push its unchristian, nation-breaking, and destructive immigration policies? Certainly, one reason is that it’s part of Rome’s overarching plan to create a one-world government and one-world religion. Rome of the granddaddy of all globalist enterprises. Those who think the World Economic Forum, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, or George Soros are the leading globalists are very much mistaken. Rome predates them all. What is more, the popes of Rome and their henchmen have regularly and openly called for world government.
The looming expiry of Title 42 is expected to bring an influx of migrants to the southern US border.
Your land, strangers devour it in your presence.
Isaiah 1:7
When I was a kid, I remember going on a snipe hunt. A snipe, we were told, was this somewhat mysterious beast that came out at night, and it was our job to catch one. The problem was nobody seemed to really know what a snipe looked like. That’s a bit of a problem. Because if you don’t know what you’re looking for, you can’t recognize it, even if it’s standing right in front of you. Unsurprisingly, our search for the mythical snipe, while it was a lot of fun, ultimately proved fruitless.
The contemporary Protestant church is much like we kids were on our snipe hunt. Books are written about Antichrist and some people seem to know who he is or was. The preterists will tell you Antichrist has long since come and gone in the person of the emperor Nero. We have nothing to fear from him in the 21st century. The futurist school, which dominates in our own time, sees Antichrist as having not yet come. While preterism and futurism come to very different conclusions about the identity of Antichrist, they have this one thing in common, there is no current Antichrist.
Actually, preterism and futurism have something else in common: They were both developed by the Jesuits during the counterreformation to take the heat off the pope, whom the reformers almost to a man had identified as the Antichrist, man of sin, and son of perdition of the Scriptures. This stance, identifying the office of the papacy as the Antichrist, is one facet of the Protestant school of prophetic interpretation known as historicism.
“Looks Like He Made it While Waiting for a Table at the Cracker Barrel.” That was Jimmy Kimmel’s arrogant comment about Tucker Carlson’s video from which this image was taken.
Defenestration. It’s an interesting word. One that gets your attention.
Literally, it means the act of throwing someone out of a window – for a Biblical example, think of Queen Jezebel. A more recent example is known in history as the Second Defenestration of Prague which took place in 1618 and is cited as a spark that set off the Thirty Years’ War.
When used today, defenestration is commonly meant in a figurative sense. That is the sudden or violent removal of someone from his position. And it is in the metaphorical sense that I use the term in this instance.
I confess I found Carlson’s work to be a breath of fresh air compared to the normal diet of talking points from network new programs. He was, in my opinion, the only mainstream TV personality that was worth watching. Any number of times I found myself watching his show in amazement at what he was talking about. Not, mind you, that I was amazed at the content so much as I was that someone on a major network was actually saying it.
On any given night, you could hear Carlson talking about replacement migration, the plight of men in modern America, opposing the war in Ukraine, defending the January 6th “insurrectionists,” criticizing the Federal Reserve’s practice of money printing, raising questions about the “most secure election in American history,” questioning the COVID cult including its most sacred mRNA gene therapy “vaccine” sacrament, skewering Critical Race Theory, and lambasting the LGBTQ agenda. At this best, watching Carlson was like watching an independent YouTuber or reading a blog. It was as close to an anti-corporate, anti-mainstream journalistic experience as I have seen in corporate-controlled media.
For my part, I think there are two closely related reasons for his removal. First, Carlson had the audacity to speak up for ordinary, white Americans and defend them from elites out to do them harm. Second, this is part of the establishment plan to rig the 2024 presidential election for Joe Biden or whomever they plan to install in the White House next year.
Lux Lucet 