Rome controls the immigration media narrative. If you doubt this, consider the press coverage of the lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against Annunciation House.
The story, if you’re not familiar with it, is that Ken Paxton’s office announced on 2/202/2024 that he was suing Annunciation House, an El Paso-based NGO “after discovering Potential efforts to facilitate illegal immigration.” You can read the press release here.
According to Paxton, there is significant public record information strongly suggesting Annunciation House is engaged in legal violations such as facilitating illegal entry to the United States, alien harboring, human smuggling, and operating a stash house.” Paxton’s aim is to revoke Annunciation House’s registration to operate in Texas.
Predictably, the Roman Catholic propaganda machine immediately kicked it into high gear, with nearly every article posted on Paxton’s lawsuit portraying this a David and Goliath struggle, with Paxton in the Goliath role and Annunciation House as the poor little put upon David.
Here’s a sample of the media headlines from the past two weeks to show you what I mean:
“Ken Paxton’s Annunciation House investigation is the latest attack on religious organizations aiding migrants at the border” – Texas Tribune, 2/24/2024
“Flowers: Texas off base to go after Annunciation House efforts” – Delco Times 3/1/2024
“Opinion: An attack on Annunciation House is an attack on Texas” – El Paso Matters, 3/1/2024
“Editorial: Annunciation House’s charitable acts for immigrants are not crimes” – San Antonio Express News, 2/27/2024
“Texas attorney general sets off religious liberty alarms by attacking a Catholic charity in El Paso” – Baptist News Global, 2/23/2024
“El Paso’s Saint Of The Border Negotiates A New Reality” – New Yorker, 2/23/2024
“Catholic immigrant shelter battles Texas AG, who wants to shut it down” – NBC News, 2/21/2024
Many more such headlines can be found, but I think you get the point. There is a massive media campaign to paint the Annunciation House as the innocent victim of a rogue Attorney General. Note well, these are, for the most part, secular sources. I avoided headlines from openly Roman Catholic sources intentionally, although there are plenty of those as well.
Worth noting is the headline from Baptist News Global. I don’t know much about this organization. A quick perusal of its website suggests that it’s a liberal Baptist group. That it would come out in defense of Antichrist’s treasonous immigration policies is not all that much of a surprise, as many Evangelical and Protestant organizations, even putatively conservative ones such as the Southern Baptist Convention, have echoed Rome’s immigration philosophy of mass welfare migration.
Worth asking is this question, Is it an accident that Rome’s profoundly destructive immigration theory and practice receive such favorable coverage in the new media? The answer is no, it is not. Rome controls the immigration narrative presented to the public in the media.
By “narrative,” I mean the context in which the news stories are set, the way events are explained. Take the headline above, “Editorial: Annunciation House’s charitable acts for immigrants are not crimes.” Calling the millions – some say up to 10 million – people who have poured across our southern border “immigrants” is simply dishonest. This is an invasion, not an immigration, and I’m fairly certain that the editorial writers at the San Antonio Express News know that full well.
A book published in the 1980s titled American Democracy & The Vatican: Population Growth & National Security provides some interesting insights as to how Rome goes about controlling the media narrative. The short answer is that they attack “offending” newspaper’s advertisers.
Father Mullaly concluded this revealing document with a platform of action for punishing critical American newspapers:
1. Do not attack a magazine or newspaper through its editorial department but act through its business office.
2. When a magazine or newspaper is attacking your religion, write to the business manager and inform him that you will not buy the offending periodical again, and mean it.
3. Call the attention of the merchants with whom you deal to the insults and tell them that as long as they advertize in any offending paper you will not buy their goods, and mean it.
4. Tell your news-dealer that as long as you see the magazine or newspaper on his stand as an open insult to you, you will not buy from him, and mean it.[1]
Note that Mullaly’s first rule is not to argue against the publication’s editorial department. That is, Mullaly is not interested in debating ideas. He wants to shut down debate by silencing the opposition.
A survey of American press coverage on the faceoff between Ken Paxton and Annunciation House suggests that Mullaly’s approach to censorship via threat has been highly effective.
[1] Mumford, Stephen D. American Democracy and the Vatican: Population Growth and National Security. Church and State Press. Kindle Edition. Worth noting, the ADL and other Jewish groups use similar tactics when attacking publishes who refuse to bow to their censorship demands. This tweet by the ADL from 2022 is an example of their handiwork https://twitter.com/ADL/status/1588587735711121408?lang=en.
Lux Lucet 