Posted in Radio Lux Lucet, tagged Christian Zionism, Covid Tyranny, Covid Vax Injuries, Free Speech, GOP, Martin Luther, Politics on January 8, 2023| Leave a Comment »
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyPosted in Politics, Scripturalism, tagged Antichrist, Athaliah, Bible and Politics, Joe Biden, Papal Antichrist, Politics, The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate on October 9, 2022| Leave a Comment »
And when Athaliah the mother of Ahaziah saw that her son was dead, she arose and destroyed all the seed royal.
Today I’d like to wrap up our look at Jehoiada’s righteous interposition on behalf of the legitimate Davidic line of kings and the people of Judah.
As we’ve discussed so far, the purpose of this series is to look at an important but largely ignored Biblical doctrine known as the doctrine of the lesser magistrate. Last week we defined the doctrine of the lesser magistrate using Matthew Trewhella’s book The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates. In his book, Trewhella gives the following definition of this doctrine,
The lesser magistrate doctrine declares that when the superior or higher civil authority makes unjust/immoral laws or decrees, the lesser or lower ranking civil authority has both a right and duty to refuse obedience to that superior authority. If necessary, the lesser authorities even have the right and obligation to actively resist the superior authority (1).
It’s important to define and discuss this doctrine because Christians in the West find themselves in situations where more and more they live under governments that are openly hostile to them. Good is now evil and evil is now good. In some places, Christians can find themselves prosecuted for quoting what the Bible says about homosexuality, while satanic transgender activists are free to recruit kids for their perverted cause.
Here in the United States, we have a situation much like what Judah faced under Queen Athaliah, an illegitimate government that goes out of its way to implement evil policies. Athaliah was a murderess and promoter of Baal worship. Joe Biden works tirelessly to implement the Vatican’s globalist agenda via his climate change policies, unprecedented illegal immigration, attacking the Americans’ Second Amendment rights, fanning the flames of war in eastern Europe, the promoting sexual perversion, and accusing patriotic, Christian Americans of sedition when they speak out against his evil.
When faced with evil government dictates, some Christians will point to Romans 13:1 – Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities – and argue that there is no legitimate or almost no legitimate reason for Christians ever to push back against evil government commands. If a governor says that you have to shut down your church due to Covid, you shut down your church due to Covid, and that’s just that. Anything else is unrighteous rebellion. That this is a widespread opinion can be seen by the number of churches that bent their knee when told to close their doors “to stop the spread.”
On the other hand, there are some people who hold that primate rebellion is a justified response against a tyrannical government. There are several instances where the kings of Judah and Israel were murdered by political opponents. Oddly, young king Joash, whom Jehosheba and Jehoiada saved, would later be murdered by his servants. But the murder of Joash, even though Joash had clearly deviated from the paths of righteousness later in life, is clearly condemned in the Scriptures.
So we see that neither blind obedience nor private rebellion is the Christian answer to dealing with tyrannical governments. The Christian answer is the doctrine of the lesser magistrate. A doctrine we see modeled quite well by the righteous high priest Jehoiada. Jehoiada hid the young, rightful heir to the throne of Judah for six years. After that period had elapsed, he organized a military guard, brought the seven-year-old Joash out in public, and made him king.
That’s where we left off last week. Let us now consider the beneficial effects of Jehoiada’s actions and what lessons American and other Western Christians can take from his example.
Posted in Politics, Scripturalism, tagged Athaliah, Bible and Politics, Feminism, Politics, The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate on October 2, 2022| Leave a Comment »
And when Athaliah the mother of Ahaziah saw that her son was dead, she arose and destroyed all the seed royal.
Today we continue our look at how Christians are to conduct themselves when they find themselves living, as we are here in America in 2022, under an evil and hostile government.
For most of us in America and in the West generally, the idea that we ever would find ourselves living under a government that actively hates us and seeks to harm us has seemed like a paranoid fantasy. Yet with the growing power of globalist organizations such as the Vatican, the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and the Bilderbergers, as well as individuals such as Bill Gates and George Soros, Americans, and citizens of other once free Western nations have found themselves living under governments that are actively and openly hostile to their political and economic liberties and even their very lives.
This state of affairs raises a number of questions for Christians. How is a Christian to respond when living under a hostile government? Does a Christian have a right to resist an evil government, or does he simply have to put up with whatever laws a rogue government enacts, however evil and destructive they are? If resistance is an option, who does the resisting? What actions constitute proper resistance if resistance can ever be considered proper?
Last week we considered the actions of a private citizen to resist the actions of evil, usurping Queen Athaliah by looking at Jehosheba, who took it upon herself to rescue the only remaining heir of the Davidic throne from the murderous queen, thus preserving the David dynasty. Had Jehosheba not stepped up and saved the infant Joash, there would have been no continuing line of David to sit on the throne of Judah and God’s promise would have been made void. One lesson we can take from this is that private citizens may resist the commands or the actions of a ruler when those actions are evil.
The basis for private citizens is clearly seen in Romans 13. There, we read that the civil magistrate is, “God’s minister to you for good.” If the civil magistrate is “God’s minister,” it is God who is sovereign, not the magistrate. This means that the magistrate’s power is delegated to him by God and does not originate with himself. As such, the civil magistrate is bound by the law of God just as is the private citizen. Rulers do not have a license to lie, cheat, steal, or murder any more than a private citizen does. But if this is the case, who can call the civil magistrate to account? Or to put the question slightly differently, is it ever appropriate to rebel against and forcibly remove from power an evil ruler? And if it is, who can rightfully do this?
The Scriptures rule out the idea of private citizens taking matters into their own hands. Christians are enjoined to pray for rulers so that they may live peaceable lives. Christians can rebuke evil rules for their evil deeds. Take for example John the Baptist’s rebuke of Philip for taking his brother’s wife. But leading a violent rebellion is not something Christians as private citizens are called to do. As further proof of this, we see examples in the Scriptures of men who assassinated evil kings – for example, those men who assassinated King Joash when he went rogue later in life – being treated like murderers.
So, is it ever appropriate for Christians to use physical violence to rebel against an evil ruler? Not for Christian private citizens. But it is appropriate for Christians who wield civil power to do so. In Protestant circles, this idea has historically been known as the doctrine of the lesser magistrate. In his book The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates: A Proper Resistance to Tyranny and a Repudiation of Unlimited Obedience to Civil Government, Matthew Trewhella defines the doctrine of the lesser magistrate thus,
The lesser magistrate doctrine declares that when the superior or higher civil authority makes unjust/immoral laws or decrees, the lesser or lower ranking civil authority has both a right and duty to refuse obedience to that superior authority. If necessary, the lesser authorities even have the right and obligation to actively resist the superior authority (1).
Note well, as Trewhella has defined it, the doctrine of the lesser magistrate states that lower ranking civil authorities not only have the right to actively resist superior authorities, but when those superior authorities make unjust or immoral laws or decrees, they even have the duty to do so.
Let us now turn to the example of the faithful High Priest Jehoiada to see how his interposition helped to remove a wicked government and restore the God-ordained Davidic monarchy to Judah.
Posted in Radio Lux Lucet, tagged Critical Race Theory, Get Woke Go Broke, John Robbins, Philosophy, Politics, Social Justice, The Apostle Paul, Woke, Woke Protestants on December 19, 2021| Leave a Comment »
“‘The situation is dire’; Salvation Army facing toy, donation shortage ahead of holidays,” by Fox 13 News Staff, 12/13/2021
“The Salvation Army’s Response to False Claims on the Topic of Racism,” 11/25/2021
“Wokeness Infiltrates the Salvation Army,” by Kenny Xu, The Wall Street Journal, 12/16/2021
International Social Justice Commission webpage of the Salvation Army
The Salvation Army’s Affiliation with the United Nations
“Study Guide on Racism,” Colonel Richard Munn
“Darrell Brooks shared pro-Hitler memes, called for violence against white people,” by Lee Brown, The New York Post, 11/24/2021
“Study Guide on Sexism,” by Colonel Richard Munn
“Biblical Principles of Giving,” by John W. Robbins, The Trinity Foundation, March 2004
“ACCC 2019 Resolution: The Evil of Critical Theory”
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyPosted in Politics, Scripturalism, Theology, tagged Covid 19, Genesis, John Calvin, Politics, Pope Francis, Rome and World Government, World Economic Forum on May 9, 2021| Leave a Comment »
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
“Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.” This quote, or some variant to it, has been attributed to several prominent people. In searching for the origin of the quote, I found it credited to such notables as John Knox, William Tyndale, and Benjamin Franklin. Thomas Jefferson used “Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God” on his personal seal. Jefferson wanted to use this saying on the Seal of the United States
Whatever the origin of the quote, many Christians today are troubled by the notion that it is ever a Christian’s duty to resist tyranny. Citing Paul’s injunction in Romans 13 “Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities,” they take Paul’s command to be, if not an absolute, at least something very close to it.
The extent of the civil magistrate’s legitimate authority came to the surface in 2020 with the coming of the Covid 19 restrictions across much of the world. These restrictions not only affected schools, universities, and businesses, but also churches. Sincere Christians, when considering how to react to government restrictions, in particular government restrictions on church meetings, came to different conclusions. Some believed it was the duty of Christians to obey every command of the various civil authorities that restricted, or outright prohibited, church meetings. Others considered it a Christian duty to resist such edicts. Because of these different views, as a follow up to last week’s post on the divine origin of civil government, it seemed good to me to say something about the relationship of civil government to the church.
To take the suspense out of things, I’ll tell you my view of the matter up front. Christians are required to obey civil magistrates, but only in the Lord. The civil magistrate, while a legitimate minister of God, has limited authority. This was also John Calvin’s view. He wrote,
The characteristic of a true sovereign is, to acknowledge that, in the administration of his kingdom, he is a minister of God. He who does not make his reign subservient to the divine glory, acts the part not of a king, but a robber. He, moreover, deceives himself who anticipates long prosperity to any kingdom which is not ruled by the sceptre of God, that is, by his divine word (Institutes, Prefatory Address).
Later in the Institutes, Calvin wrote,
We are subject to the men who rule over us, but subject only in the Lord. If they command anything against Him let us not pay the least regard to it, nor be moved by all the dignity which they possess as magistrates – a dignity to which no injury is done when it is subordinated to the special and truly supreme power of God (Book IV, Chapter 20.32).
It is the view of this author that the civil authority has no jurisdiction to regulate how Christian churches conduct their worship services, and that all such regulation represents overreach on the part of the civil magistrate. This is not to say that Christian ministers and Christians themselves are not subject to the governing authorities. If Christians commit acts that are contrary to the law of God and the just civil laws of society, then they are justly punished by the civil magistrate. But the regulation or prohibition of singing hymns, capacity limits due to Covid, or even outright prohibition on gathering on the Lord’s Day? All such restrictions by the civil authorities are tyrannical and ought to be resisted by Christians everywhere.
Posted in Politics, Scripturalism, Theology, tagged Genesis, Homosexuality and the Bible, John Calvin, John Robbins, Libertarianism, Politics, Scripturalism on May 2, 2021| 1 Comment »
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
In the famous opening sentence of his Treatise on the Social Company, Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote, “Man is born free, but he is everywhere in change.”
While Rousseau’s social compact theory of government is not Christian, his observation that man is everywhere in chains certainly rings true. We can see this in the history recorded for us in the Bible as well as from secular sources. For that matter, we can see it simply reading the news of the day.
Jesus himself noted the authoritarian nature of civil government in his response to the disciples’ arguing about who among them was the greatest. Jesus responded to them,
The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them, and those who exercise authority over them are called ‘benefactors.’ But not so among you; on the contrary, he who is greatest among you, let him be as the younger, and he who governs as he who serves (Luke 22:25-26).
Note that the kings of the Gentiles do two things. First, they exercise lordship. The Greek verb translated “exercise lordship” can also mean “be the lord or master of.” Perhaps another way of expressing the meaning of the Greek is to use the English expression “lord it over.” We talk that way. We say so and so is lording it over someone. Certainly, that was true of the kings and emperors who governed during Jesus ministry. They lorded it over their people. What the kings of the earth wanted, they took, and there was little to stop them.
The second thing these kings did was be called “benefactor.” On one hand they oppressed their people, but on the other, they wanted to be known as men of generosity. A modern example of this is Joseph Stalin, who, while being one of the most ruthless of the 20th century dictators used the title “Dear Father” among others.
From Jesus response to his disciples, we clearly see that there is a large gap between the Biblical teaching about how government should operate – the idea that government is a servant to the people – and how it actually does operate.
But even more basic than the questions what should government do and how should it go about doing it is the question, why should one man obey another man?
To answer these questions, we must turn to the Scriptures where we find the origin of civil government.
Posted in Radio Lux Lucet, tagged 2020 Presidential Campaign, Donald Trump Impeachment, Feminism, Justification By Faith Alone, Politics, Roman Church-State on February 14, 2021| Leave a Comment »
“Trump acquitted, denounced in historic impeachment trial” by Lisa Mascaro, Eric Tucker and Mary Clare Jalonick
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyPosted in Radio Lux Lucet, tagged Civil Disobedience, Coronavirus, Covid 19, Politics on November 21, 2020| Leave a Comment »
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearlyPosted in Politics, Presidential Campaign 2020, tagged 2016 Presidential Election, 2020 Presidential Campaign, Donald Trump Impeachment, George Soros, Politics on February 9, 2020| Leave a Comment »
Donald Trump holds up copy of Washington Post with headline announcing his acquittal by the Senate, Feb. 6, 2020.
Facing an impeachment hearing and senate trial for his part in the cover up related to the Watergate burglary, then President Richard Nixon chose to resign from office in August 1974. Upon being sworn into office, President Gerald R. Ford gave a brief 850-word address in which he uttered the now famous line, “My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.”
Being all of eight years old at the time, I didn’t have a super sophisticated understanding of all that was going on, but I did get the gist of it. President Nixon had done something wrong and tried to hide it. Now, he had to resign.
But more than the particulars related to the case, what I recall from that period was the overwhelming sense of boredom I had with hearing about Watergate and anything Watergate related. It really did seem like along national nightmare that went on year after year after year. No doubt, some of that was due to my age. When you’re eight years old, six months seems like a lifetime, because, in a way, it is.
In truth, the whole Watergate saga took about two years and two months to play out. On June 17, 1972, the Watergate burglars were arrested. On August 9, 1974, Nixon resigned.
That was then.
Posted in Immigration, tagged Anchor Babies, Birth Tourism, Birthright Citizenship, John Robbins, Politics on January 26, 2020| Leave a Comment »
Q. 62. What is the visible church?
A. The visible church is a society made up of all such as in all ages and places of the world do profess the true religion, and of their children.
– Westminster Larger Catechism
Last week it was announced that the U.S. State Department had adopted a new rule governing the issuance of category B nonimmigrant visas. The rule, which took effect on Friday, Jan. 24, is aimed at reducing birth tourism. Birth tourism is the practice of expectant mothers traveling to the United States to give birth on U.S. soil for the purpose of acquiring American citizenship for their children.
For those of us who have advocated for reform of America’s disastrous immigration laws in a way that protects the legitimate interest of American citizens, this was a welcomed, if limited, victory. It is a welcomed victory in that, in the words of the State Department document outlining the ruling, “This rule will help prevent operators in the birth tourism industry from profiting off treating U.S. citizenship as a commodity, sometimes through potentially criminal acts…” It is a limited victory in that it leaves open the larger, more important question, of birthright citizenship. Specifically, the question of to whom birthright citizenship properly applies.
In the opinion of this author, birthright citizenship properly applies only to children born to parents, either both, or at least one of them, possessing American citizenship. The notion that a child can rightfully acquire American citizenship by virtue of being born on American soil, regardless of the citizenship status of the parents, is foreign both to the Bible and, in the view of this author, to the Constitution.
A Scripturalist (Clarkian) podcast about Christian theology, politics and economics.
Lux Lucet 