Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, center, and other Catholic clergy from Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, and El Paso take part in a binational Mass Nov. 5, 2022, in memory of migrants who died during their journey to the U.S. near the border between Mexico and the United States. What Mark Seitz and the other notables don’t tell you is that the migrants died because of Rome’s policy fostering illegal immigration. (CNS photo/Gabriel Barraza, Reuters)
And what more shall I say? For the time would fail me to tell of Gideon and Barak and Sampson and Jephthah, also of David and Samuel and the prophets: who through faith subdued kingdoms, worked righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made strong, became valiant in battle, turned to flight the armies of the aliens. Women received their dead raised to life again.
Hebrews 11:32-35
The passage above falls toward the end of Hebrews chapter 11, a portion of Scripture we sometimes call the faith hall of fame. That’s not a bad title to give Hebrews 11. After all, it recounts example after example of men and women from the Old Testament who trusted in the Lord, that is, they believed God’s words, serving as his witnesses.
In vv. 32-25, the author of Hebrews is wrapping up his review of faithful Old Testament saints, quickly passing over a few names and giving examples of their accomplishments. In some cases, it’s fairly easy to discern who performed which of the acts mentioned in the passage. In other cases, it’s not so clear.
One aspect of the deeds mentioned here is that they are not necessarily works we would always think of as acts done in faith. In our own day, many people, perhaps even some Christians, would think of them more as acts of bravery or some technical know-how than as acts done in faith. I’m talking here of such works as “subduing kingdoms,” “becoming valiant in battle,” and “turning to flight the armies of the aliens.” These are works that many would consider more in the realm of secular public policy than anything Christian.
But as Christians, at least those who have a proper understanding of God’s sovereignty, know, there is nothing that happens outside of his will. There is nothing independent of God. There is nothing that is truly “secular” as some would use that word, as if there are some matters that are not subject to God’s decretive and preceptive will.
I say this because one of the besetting sins of contemporary Christians – and I’m talking here about people who claim to believe the Bible, not secular humanists dressed up in Christian clothing – is to suppose that they can adopt the world’s tactics to fight spiritual battles and hope to win.
One example of this is how some Christians have tried to push back on Darwinism by arguing, not for Biblical creation as set forth in Genesis 1, but for “intelligent design.” They will try to undermine Darwinism not by using the Bible, but by employing scientific arguments only. Now there’s nothing wrong with using scientific reasoning as ad hominem arguments to show where the Darwinists are inconsistent. For example, one can argue that the fossil records do not show t the gradual changing of one species into another as Darwinian evolution supposes took place, but rather sharp breaks where entirely new species seem to appear ex nihilo (out of nothing). This undermines the atheistic, secularist arguments for evolution and it’s entirely proper for Christians to bring up this argument as well as other such arguments.
But if all we do is rely on scientific arguments to make our case, then we’re not going to win the fight. Some want to tell Christians “Keep your Bible out of the public sphere” as if only scientific arguments that are supposedly “neutral” are acceptable, while “faith-based” arguments are unacceptable. All arguments are “faith-based” in the sense that they rest on certain assumptions, first principles, called axioms. Science, for example, rests on the notion of the general reliability of the senses.
Uniformitarianism – the idea that the earth has always changed in uniform ways and that the present is the key to the past[1] – is another scientific axiom. But this has not always been the case. According to National Geographic, before 1830, “scientists subscribed to catastrophism,” which posits that the features we see on the Earth came about as the result of sudden change. As Christians, we believe in a Biblical form of catastrophism. As the Scriptures teach, God’s work of creation is his creating all things out of nothing, by the word of his power, in the space of six [literal 24-hour] days, and all very good. Likewise, we hold to Noah’s flood as recorded in Genesis 6-9. But try bringing these Biblical arguments into a modern secular university, and you’ll be laughed to scorn.
And yet as Christians, these are the very arguments that we must make if we are to “turn to flight the armies” of the atheist scholars who are destroying our nation. It should be noted that the people who want to tell you that one species can change into another are the same ones who want to convince you that men can change into women and women into men.
In the end, there are no secular battles. There are only spiritual battles. And this brings me to the main reason why I have written on immigration the way I have. I have framed it as a fight between the Antichrist, globalist, New World Order (NWO) of the Roman Catholic Church-State and the Biblical, Protestant Westphalian World Order (WWO). It is a battle between a false church with a false gospel that saves no one and the true church of Jesus Christ that preaches the true gospel of Justification by Belief Alone and all its implications such as political and economic liberty. Understood this way, immigration is not some secular issue to be argued about using secular arguments, that is, arguments divorced from the Scriptures, but a spiritual battle to be fought by spiritual means.
The Apostle Paul enjoined Timothy to “fight the good fight of faith.” The battle over immigration is not some battle that Christians can pursue as if it were a matter of making conservative political arguments “to own the liberals.” Even the representatives of the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State understand that this is a spiritual battle. Read the arguments Rome makes for its immigration socialism. The most important Roman Catholic document on immigration is the 1952 Apostolic Constitution The Emigrée Family of Nazareth. In it, Pope Pius XII attempts to argue that the example of Joseph taking Mary and Jesus to Egypt to avoid King Herod’s persecution is the model for “every migrant, alien and refugee of whatever kind.” According to Rome, when we see millions of illegal aliens pouring across our southern border, we really are supposed to see Jesus and his family. This is all a lot of nonsense as I’ve discussed elsewhere.[2] Rather, it is a Scripture twisting attempt by Antichrist to convince the unwary that the Bible supports theft and world government, when, in fact, it does not.
In Ephesians 5:11, Paul writes, “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.” Rome’s immigration policies of mass, nation-breaking welfare migration is an “unfruitful work of darkness,” and, therefore, Christians are under obligation 1) to have no fellowship with it, that is, we are not to promote it, and 2) are to expose it, or as the King James reads, “reprove it.” And how do we expose Rome’s lies about its irredentist, unchristian, immoral theory and practice of immigration? We reprove Rome from the Word of God. We fight, not as secularists, not as conservatives, but as Christians.
Jesus said, “Apart from me, you can do nothing.” The long string of theological and political defeats suffered by American Protestants over the last 100-plus years tells us what we should have known all along. If we keep sheathed our one offensive weapon, “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,” not only will we continue to lose every battle, but we will also deserve to lose.
Migrants cross into Slovenia, 2015 Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images
When one surveys the Western world in 2023, he finds a most amazing phenomenon: with one exception, all the governments of the West express open hatred for their own people and are actively attempting to destroy them.
I covered this topic in my recent post “The Trouble with Scotland.” Here in America, the Biden Regime demonstrates its hatred for ordinary Americans in any number of ways, but perhaps in no way more dramatically than its treasonous border policies that have resulted in millions of illegal aliens pouring across our southern border with Mexico.
What is more, it doesn’t seem to matter at all what the people of the West actually want or whom they vote for. Just last year, newly elected Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who ran on a platform of immigration control, has seen migration across the Mediterranean double in the past nine months and recently granted work permits to 425k non-EU workers. The conservative government of Great Britain has done nothing to halt the flow of welfare migrants coming across the Channel.
I mentioned above that there is one exception to the migration madness that’s overtaken the West. That exception is a man I’ve mentioned before in this space, Hungary’s Viktor Orban.
Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof.
Leviticus 25:10
As we approach the 247th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, I’m moved once again to consider what a precious and rare commodity liberty is.
Throughout the course of human history, most people have lived under some form of lawless tyranny. Whether it was the pharaohs and kings of the ancient near east, the Caesars of Rome, the medieval popes, or the fascist and communist dictators of more recent times, the lot of most men in most places at most times is to have their rulers “lord it over them” as Jesus put it.
Given the long history of tyranny experienced by the human race, it’s worth asking why it is that we in the West have experienced such a long and blessed period of liberty. Growing up, I was taught that our constitutional republic was the product of the Enlightenment. It wasn’t until I was long out of school that I learned that the liberty that we historically have enjoyed as Americans was not the product of secular thought, but of the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century.
I could go on, but these headlines, typical of legacy media’s decade-plus-long assault on Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, give the reader a fair example of the kind of hate Orban faces from news organizations.
The occasion of the latest media meltdown over Orban was his fourth consecutive election victory on 4/3/2022.
The BBC article summed up the EU’s opinion on his election win thus, “You could almost hear the collective thud of EU hearts sinking on Sunday night as Viktor Orban made his victory speech.”
Ah, the sound of globalist heads exploding. Now that’s music to my ears.
Ukrainian tanks move into the city of Mariupol on Thursday after Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized his military to move into eastern Ukraine. Reuters.
“Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.”
Matthew 7:12
In his essay “The Religious Wars of the 21st Century,” John Robbins wrote, “The conservative movement in the United States has abandoned the American (and Biblical) foreign policy of strategic independence pursued by our government since 1776 for a policy of global interventionism that has angered many foreign nations and peoples, most recently the Muslims.”
To our 21st century ears, the idea of conducting a foreign policy of “strategic independence,”, a foreign policy that avoids foreign entanglements, minds one’s own business, and treats other nations in the same way we’d like to be treated, sounds strange.
Growing up as I did during the Cold War, I thought it was perfectly normal to have American troops stationed all over the world. Germany, Japan, Korea, and many other nations all were occupied by American forces.
Although I dreaded the idea of the military draft as a young man, had you asked me at the time I would have said I supported it as it was all about doing my duty.
It was only later after I became a Christian and after I read the work of John Robbins, that I began to develop a Biblical view of foreign policy.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken stands with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov before their meeting, in Geneva, Switzerland, January 21, 2022. Alex Brandon | Reuters
“The great law of morality ought to have a national as well as a personal and individual application. We should act toward other nations as we wish them to act toward us….”
President Biden is considering deploying several thousand U.S. troops, as well as warships and aircraft, to NATO allies in the Baltics and Eastern Europe, an expansion of American military involvement amid mounting fears of a Russian incursion into Ukraine, according to administration officials.
The situation in Ukraine, long-simmering in the background, appears to be coming to a head. There are a number of issues contributing to the growing tensions between Russia and NATO, the most important of which is the possible inclusion of Ukraine in the NATO alliance. Russia has made it clear that NATO expansion into Ukraine is unacceptable. In the words of Russia’s deputy foreign minister Sergey Ryabkov, “It is absolutely mandatory to make sure that Ukraine never ever becomes a member of NATO.” American Secretary of State Antony Blinken and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg have countered by stating that Russia has no say in the matter of who is allowed into NATO.
What are Christians to make of this? Is Russia right to object to Ukraine joining NATO, or are the Americans right to seek to incorporate Ukraine in the NATO alliance? Are both sides wrong? Scripturalists, those who believe that the Bible has a systematic monopoly on truth, including truth on foreign policy, seek to answer these questions by appealing to the Word of God, the 66 books of the Bible. What do they say?