Christian Zionist and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. In a recent speech, Huckabee implied that Israel is America’s wife.
In a post on X dated 11/01/2025, Tony Perkins quoted Mike Gallagher saying, “Israel has a right to exist. I believe [what] the Bible tells us about God’s chosen people….”[1]
One of the central tenets of Christian Zionism is that the Jews, because they are Jews, apart from belief in the Lord Jesus Christ, are God’s chosen people. But is this what the Bible teaches?
Sebastian Zapeta, the man suspected of setting a woman on fire on a New York subway. Reports indicate that he’s from Guatemala and is an illegal alien. According to Tom Homan, Trump’s incoming Border Czar, the Biden Regime “did not deport [him] when they had the chance.” Sadly, another American is dead because of the treasonous immigration policy of “Jesuit” Joe Biden and his Antichrist boss in the Vatican.
Antichrist never stops lying about what the Scriptures teach about immigration, not even during Christmas. Quite the contrary, far from taking a break from his lies during Christmas, the Pope and his henchmen crank up the volume, hoping to deceive, if possible, even the elect.
Central to the Antichrist’s Christmastide immigration lies is his attempt to spin the millions upon millions of illegal aliens pouring across America’s southern border as mirroring the Biblical account of Joseph taking Mary and Jesus and fleeing to Egypt to escape Herod’s persecution.
While on the surface, Rome’s argument may seem plausible, closer examination shows it to be just another lie from the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State designed to further its globalist ambitions. Let’s take a look at it.
He could have given us the Monstrous Regiment, but he didn’t. He could have given us a president who was in part responsible for releasing a millions-strong welfare migrant horde on our nation, but he didn’t. He could have given us a president who has openly attacked our First Amendment right to free speech, but he didn’t.
In short, America, much like Donald Trump in Butler, PA, dodged a bullet last week. As the psalmist says, “He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.”
Pope Francis stands on an altar facing the U.S. before celebrating Mass during a February 2016 trip to Juarez. A mere five years later, America’s second Roman Catholic president unleashed a border invasion the likes of which America had never seen. Photo: Robin Zielinski/Las Cruces Sun-News.
I’ve titled this talk “Antichrist’s Irredentist Immigration Assault on America: A Review of Strangers No Longer.” Before going on, it would be helpful to define a few terms.
Antichrist
My definition of Antichrist is the same as that of the Westminster Confession of Faith that historically has identified “the Pope of Rome” as “that Antichrist, man of sin and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that it called God.”[1]
While this definition of Antichrist was the standard position of Reformed writers from the 16th century through the early 20th century, calling the Pope “Antichrist” today is considered, at best, bad manners and shocking in many circles.
The identification of the Pope of Rome as Antichrist is one of the more prominent conclusions of what is known as the “Protestant system” prophetic interpretation. This school of thought is also known as Historicism.[2] Historicists hold that Revelation records the history of the church from the time John wrote the book in the first century through the second coming of Jesus Christ.
U.S. President Joe Biden, right, greets Pope Francis ahead of a working session on Artificial Intelligence (AI), Energy, Africa-Mediterranean, on day two of the 50th G7 summit at Borgo Egnazia, southern Italy, June 14, 2024.
Many Christians entirely miss the political and cultural influence of the Vatican, even when it’s reported publicly, even when it’s held up right in front of their faces.
Consider how many influential Americans the pope has met with just recently.
In May 2024, New York Governor Kathy Hochul met with the Pope while attending a client change conference. The New York Post reports that Francis “presented her with a rosary.”
Jesuit-educated California Governor Gavin Newsom met with Pope Francis in May 2024. According to this article in Politico, “When the pope calls, Newsom answers.”
Note well that the papal audiences described above are just with Americans and held over the past month. If you follow the news at all, you’ll know that these are not just ordinary Americans but individuals at the very top of the political and cultural pyramid.
Beit Lahia in northern Gaza on Dec. 26, following Israeli bombardments. PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
I’ve written a great deal over the years in the space criticizing Roman Catholicism, but I’ve not had much to say about Dispensationalism. But both of them seem to have this in common: they are deeply superstitious.
Now Romanism and Dispensationalism are not superstitious in the same way. Romanism with its worship of Mary and the saints,[1] its doctrine of transubstantiation, and its cult of relics is thoroughly imbued with superstition. Dispensationalism, on the other hand, is a superstition that has taken over large parts of the professing Evangelical church in the United States, its chief superstition being the worship, or something close to it, of the modern nation-state of Israel.
Pastor Greg Locke, a Baptist preacher, is one of many examples of Israel worshipping American Evangelicals on the scene today. In a post on X dated 5/11/2024, Locke spent 588 words expressing his thoughts on Israel, even threatening to dismiss congregants whose views did not conform to his. Locke wrote, “In the last days there will be ONE dividing factor in the Body of Christ.” Locke enumerated several things that were not dividing factors: who kept their church open or closed (apparently a reference to Covid), cessationists vs. those who operate “in the gifts,” traditional vs. contemporary worship, or Bible versions. Interestingly, Locke did not mention those who believe in sovereign grace or free will or those who hold to justification by belief alone vs. those who hold that one is saved by faith plus something else. No, these are all minor issues. The big dividing line for Pastor Locke is what one believes about the nation-state of Israel.
I have a confession to make. I’m a glass-half-empty guy. I don’t recall any particular event that made me that way. No crushing tragedy that I can point to or someone I can blame. It seems that it’s my nature to be so. But perhaps there’s something more to it than my own personality.
If you pressed me on why I tend to look on the dark side of things, maybe it has something to do with the zeitgeist, the spirit of the age. I was born in the 1960s into a collapsing civilization, the collapse of which has only accelerated over the course of my life. Civilizational collapse is not a pretty sight for anyone with a philosophical bent. Of course, philosophical reflection is not a prerequisite to experiencing the impact of a civilizational collapse. When the barbarians are scaling the walls and burning your city, even the least reflective man knows he’s in trouble.
But barbarians scaling the walls and burning the city mark not the beginning of a civilization’s collapse but its end. What marks the earlier stages of a collapse is the rejection of truth, the belief in the lie, and decisions based on the lie – things which at the time may have seemed righteous and good and progressive to many – but which eventually and necessarily lead to destruction. “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death” to quote Proverbs.
Martin Luther as the “German Hercules” vanquishing the doctors of Rome. Hans Holbein the Younger, 1520. Brother Martin was not confused about the identity of Antichrist.
Have you prayed against Antichrist today?
To answer that question truthfully, you first need to know who Antichrist is. Protestants once knew the identity of Antichrist. But the Protestant school of prophetic interpretation has been out of fashion for a long time, and other systems such as Postmillennialism, Amillennialism, and Dispensationalism have captured the bulk of Reformed and Evangelical pulpits in our day.
For the Postmillennialists, Antichrist is yesterday’s news. He came and went in the first century, so there’s no need to pray against him. For in the literal sense of the word he is history.
With the Dispensationalists it’s not much different. For them, there’s no need to pray against Antichrist, because Antichrist will not appear until sometime in the future. When Isaiah prophesied to King Hezekiah that the Babylonians would come and carry off all Judah’s treasure to Babylon, he exclaimed, “The word of the LORD which you have spoken is good…Will there not be peace and truth at least in my days?” Hezekiah saw the destruction of Jerusalem as a small thing since it was an event in the distant future and would not affect him. Not Hezekiah’s finest moment, that. For Dispensationalists, it is much the same way. The coming of Antichrist is a future event and not a clear and present danger. Perhaps some Dispensationalists pray against the supposedly future Antichrist, but human nature being what it is, probably most do not.
Fake asylum-seeking illegal aliens enter the Catholic Charities respite center in McAllen, TX, on August 10, 2021.
“Catholic charities is a prime [of an NGO facilitating Biden’s Border Rush] example. They’re really the 800-pound gorilla when it comes to this.”
Mike Howell of the Heritage Foundation
My Comments: My goal as a Christin concerned about the destructive and treasonous immigration policies of our government is to systematically expose the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church’s role in the process. Why’s that my goal? Because hardly anyone else is doing it.
A lot of commentators will talk about “globalists” and their plots to destroy America. But hardly any of them get down to specifics. But to speak of globalists and not to speak specifically about the Roman Church-State is really a form of dodging the issue while appearing to speak about it.
Evidence that Rome is behind the immivation of the United States and other Western nations abounds, but hardly anyone will speak about it. This is unfortunate. Americans deserve to know who’s attacking them and why. But beyond that, there’s a spiritual issue at stake. The Apostle Paul enjoined believers “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.“ Christians are called, not only to avoid fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but are called to expose them, that is, to point them out to others. My aim as a writer on immigration is to expose Rome’s unfruitful works of darkness in flooding my country with illegal aliens and all the harm this brings.
I consider it my Christian duty to speak against Rome’s destruction of my homeland and I cannot be quiet about it. It is in this spirit, the spirit of seeking to expose Rome’s unfruitful works of darkness, that I write and speak against the manifold evils of Rome, especially concerning its brazen role in facilitating the destruction of the United States by aiding and abetting illegal aliens, helping them not only to enter the country but to disperse them throughout the length and breadth of the land.
The link below is a piece from the Heritage Foundation, a leading conservative think tank, about the role NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) play in facilitating the immivasion of the United States. Imagine my shock (sarcasm alert) when I found that Catholic Charities was called the “800 pound gorilla” of such organizations by a representative of a mainstream conservative organization. Who knew? A Roman Catholic organization helping a Roman Catholic president carry out the Vatican’s long-term, irredentist policy of displacing the historic Protestant American nation. It’s like some kind of crazy conspiracy theory. Only it’s true.