Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden in Washington on March 24, 2021, the day he tasked her with addressing the root causes that drive migration from Central America to the U.S. I wonder if she considered the activities of Catholic Charities as a potential root cause? Probably not. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images file
We spent some time looking at the birthright citizenship issue, first, because it is such a key component of Antichrist’s irredentist immigration assault on America, and second, because at least as far as I am aware, it has been largely ignored by Christian writers.
However, other statements in SNL need to be refuted from the Scriptures. We will now turn to these.
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment reads in part,
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
The purpose of the amendment – adopted on July 2, 1868, shortly after the end of the American Civil War – as Michael Anton noted in his Washington Post opinion piece,
[W]as to resolve the question of citizenship for newly freed slaves. Following the Civil War, some in the South insisted that states had the right to deny citizenship to freedmen. In support, they cited 1857’s disgraceful Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, which held that no black American could ever be a citizen of the United States.
A constitutional amendment was thus necessary to overturn Dred Scott and to define the precise meaning of American citizenship.
That definition is the amendment’s very first sentence: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
The amendment clarified for the first time that federal citizenship precedes and supersedes its state-level counterpart. No state has the power to deny citizenship, hence none may dispossess freed slaves.[1]
Pregnant foreign nationals staked out in Mexico admit they are looking to cross the United States-Mexico border with “the goal” of securing birthright American citizenship for their anchor babies, a new report details, Breitbart. This is but one facet of Rome’s irredentist immigration assault on America.
Irredentism
“America is a dying nation. I tell the Mexicans when I am down in Mexico to keep on having children, and then to take back what we took from them: California, Texas, Arizona, and then to take the rest of the country as well.”[1]
Irredentism is probably not a word many of us use in our day-to-day conversations, but it’s an important concept when discussing Antichrist’s immigration assault on America. We defined irredentism earlier in this talk. But if you want an example of it, it would be hard-pressed to find one better than the preceding quote from Roman Catholic priest Paul Marx.
Irredentism, Christian J. Pinto tells us, is Jesuit immigration warfare.[2] It is the idea that by flooding America, a historically Anglo-Protestant nation, with millions of Roman Catholic immigrants – whether they are legal or illegal immigrants, it matters not – the popes, cardinals, bishops, priests, and nuns of Rome hope “to secure” America “to [their] holy church.”[3]
Haitian illegal aliens crossing the Rio Grande, Veronica G. Cardenas for the New York Times
Strangers No Longer is a Socialist Document
“Migrant crisis has US taxpayers on the hook for up to $451B, House GOP report says.”[1] That’s a real headline in the New York Post from November 2023.
According to the article,
Americans could pay up to $451 billion to care for migrants who entered the US illegally, but have been released into the country or escaped from custody, according to a new report due out Monday from House Republicans and obtained exclusively by The Post…
Compiled from federal and state records, media reports and other public information, the 50-page document outlines the taxpayer costs incurred in medical care, housing, education and other welfare benefits for tens of millions of migrants — to say nothing of the additional costs for law enforcement.
One could argue that this report is biased in that it was put out by the GOP while a Democrat was in the White House.
The Post article cites another study by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) claiming that “federal, state, and local costs of illegal immigration amount to around $182 billion annually—with aliens defraying just $31 billion of that cost in tax revenue.” That means American taxpayers are on the hook for $151 billion.
Pope Francis stands on an altar facing the U.S. before celebrating Mass during a February 2016 trip to Juarez. A mere five years later, America’s second Roman Catholic president unleashed a border invasion the likes of which America had never seen. Photo: Robin Zielinski/Las Cruces Sun-News.
Strangers No Longer: Together on the Journey of Hope (SNL) is the title of a 2003 pastoral letter issued jointly by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and their counterparts in Mexico. We will now turn to an analysis of this document.
In his 1984 book American Democracy & the Vatican: Population Growth & National Security, author Stephen D. Mumford noted, “Americans…are also aware that 90 percent of all illegal immigrants are Roman Catholic.”[1] Granted, these are old numbers and may not reflect the current religious affiliation of the millions of illegal aliens who have entered the United States during the Biden Administration. Nevertheless, Roman Catholics remain a significant portion of the aliens, legal and illegal, currently pouring across America’s borders.
Drawing on the dogmas outlined in Pope Pius XII’s 1952 Apostolic Constitution Exsul Familia Nazarethana, SNL can be seen as Rome’s irredentist battle plan to conquer America for the Roman Church-State using illegal immigration as one of its principal weapons. Rome’s approach to illegal immigration can be summarized thus: get ‘em in, keep ‘em in, put ‘em on the dole, legalize ‘em.
Pope Francis stands on an altar facing the U.S. before celebrating Mass during a February 2016 trip to Juarez. A mere five years later, America’s second Roman Catholic president unleashed a border invasion the likes of which America had never seen. Photo: Robin Zielinski/Las Cruces Sun-News.
I’ve titled this talk “Antichrist’s Irredentist Immigration Assault on America: A Review of Strangers No Longer.” Before going on, it would be helpful to define a few terms.
Antichrist
My definition of Antichrist is the same as that of the Westminster Confession of Faith that historically has identified “the Pope of Rome” as “that Antichrist, man of sin and son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that it called God.”[1]
While this definition of Antichrist was the standard position of Reformed writers from the 16th century through the early 20th century, calling the Pope “Antichrist” today is considered, at best, bad manners and shocking in many circles.
The identification of the Pope of Rome as Antichrist is one of the more prominent conclusions of what is known as the “Protestant system” prophetic interpretation. This school of thought is also known as Historicism.[2] Historicists hold that Revelation records the history of the church from the time John wrote the book in the first century through the second coming of Jesus Christ.