Riot police officers holding back protesters in Southport, England, on Tuesday, near the site where three children were killed in a knife attack the day before.Credit…Getty Images
A strange phenomenon has occurred in Western nations—not just in one or two, but as far as I can tell, in all of them. It’s the strange and, heretofore, unthinkable phenomenon of governments actively hating and working against the interests of their own people—the very people who voted for them, the very people who pay their salaries, the very people whom, supposedly, these governments represent.
I was reminded just how hostile Western governments are to their own people while reviewing coverage of the riots in Britain. The riots, pitting native British against Muslim immigrants/refugees, were sparked when the son of Rwandan immigrants was arrested and charged with murdering three girls at a dance class.
In light of the riots, newly elected British Prime Minister Kier Starmer took to television to denounce the rioters, stating, “Those that have participated in this violence will face the full force of the law.” Starmer was not talking about Muslim migrants, who have no business being in Britain, a historically if not presently Christian nation, whom the government has brought into the country literally by the boatload for years against the will of the British people, whom the British public is forced to subsidize. No. he was talking about the native British who have had enough of having their legitimate concerns brushed aside by those in power.
My Comments: Everywhere in the Western world, governments are bankrupting themselves to import foreigners in an overtly socialist immigration scheme. Why? Principally it is to further Antichrist’s (by Antichrist I mean the pope and his organization, the Roman Church-State) irredentist immigration war designed to breakdown independent nations and bring them under the thumb of the Vatican’s planned world government. In this case, bankrupting the state is not bug, it’s a feature.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, addresses the U.S. Congress on July 24, 2024 in Washington. Josh Morgan, USA Today.
All three religions – Romanism, Islam, and Judaism – are false, militant, and violent.
John W. Robbins, “The Religious Wars of the 21st Century”
In a piece I have cited several times before in this space, John Robbins commenting on the coming religious wars of the 21st century noted that “the religious right in America has embraced both Romanism and Judaism as saviors of the West, foolishly ignorant of the fact that they, as forms of unbelief, are destroyers of the West and causes of the collapse [of the West].”[1]
As I have noted previously, Robbins does something in his article that I have never seen done by any other writer. Rather than taking sides with Romanism, Judaism, or Islam, he describes all three as “medieval…false, militant, and violent.” But unlike Robbins, many Evangelicals do take sides with either Romanism or Judaism against the secularists and Islam.
In America, one likely would not find those who claim to be Christians, at least those of the “religious right” variety, embracing Islam. Unlike Romanism and Judaism, Islam is viewed with suspicion by the religious right due to events such as 9/11, the influence of dispensationalism, and the work of the Israel lobby.
One may be tempted to question Robbins’ characterization of Romanism, Islam, and Judaism as destroyers of the West. After all, didn’t Christianity Today run a piece in 2015 titled “From Antichrist to Brother in Christ: How Protestant Pastors View the Pope”? Further, American Christians are constantly told that they have a Biblical obligation to support the state of Israel and the Jews as “God’s chosen people.”[2]
“Antichrist’s Illegal Alien Assault on America” by Steve Matthews, The Trinity Foundation, June-August 2024. This is my paper on The Emigree Family of Nazareth, Rome’s 1952 apostolic constitution that applied socialist Roman Catholic Social Teaching to the issue of immigration. It is the document that set forth Rome’s immigration theory, the practice of which is being carried out by the Biden Regime.
After President Biden’s announcements on social media on Sunday, a crowd gathered at the White House gates. Credit…Al Drago for The New York Times
The news this afternoon was hardly unexpected: Joe Biden will not run for president in 2024.
The buzzards have been circling almost since Biden was rigged into office in 2020. Actually, they started before that. There was lots of talk leading up to the election in 2020 about how Biden would get in and resign within a year of taking office. Now, the rumors are the reality.
There was much debate among pundits about whether Biden would hang on, with Jill Biden’s role in Joe’s tenacious hold on the Democratic nomination over the past several weeks coming into focus. In the end, behind-the-scenes pressure, probably mostly donor pressure [1], proved too much.
I’m not sorry to see Biden go. He’s an evil man who has done enormous damage to the United States during his term in office, his signature work of destruction being the 10 million or more illegal aliens he allowed into America on behalf of the Vatican in support of Antichrist’s long-term goal of bringing America under the thumb of Rome.
Biden has always been the Vatican/Deep State candidate and he served his masters well. The American people, not so much.
Donald Trump being ushered off stage by the Secret Service after an assassination attempt at his rally in Pennsylvania, July 13, 2024.
The attempted assassination of Donald Trump yesterday was shocking but certainly not surprising. While they’ve been careful not to directly demand it, since at least 2015, many in America’s ruling class have invited such an attack with their repeated denunciations of Donald Trump and his supporters.
Early in the Biden Regime, someone – I don’t have the quote handy – commented that, historically, presidential candidates and presidents would attack their political opponents but not their opponents’ supporters. That’s not the case anymore.
Obama started it with his comments about the “bitter clingers,” which was the term he used to put down impoverished small-town and rural whites, who he dismissively described as bitter and clinging to their guns and religion.
Windows being covered outside of the room where absentee ballots are being counted at the TCF Center in Detroit, November 3, 2020. Kimberly P. Mitchell/USA Today Network/Reuters
Will the Democrats rig the 2024 presidential election? The only correct answer is, of course, they will.
Election rigging has a long and storied history in the party of rum, Romanism, and rebellion. It was the stock in trade of 19th and 20th big-city Democrat political machines such as Tammany Hall, and that practice has carried over into the 21st century. Election fraud is what the Democrats do best. Certainly, developing policies that appeal to normal Americans isn’t their strong suit. Stop and think about it for a moment. When was the last time the Dems ever pushed a policy that was consistent with the Constitution and improved the lives of ordinary Americans?
And I write this not as a Republican hack. I vote Republican, but not because I’m blind to the serious defects within the party. But for all the GOP’s faults – e.g., their rabid Zionism – unlike the Dems, at least Republican politicians don’t openly hate me because I’m a white, Christian man. The Dems, on the other hand, never miss a chance to denounce me and millions of other Americans like me as the dregs of humanity. Not being hated by a presidential candidate seems like a low bar as a reason to support him, but that’s where we are in America in A.D. 2024.
U.S. President Joe Biden attends the first presidential debate hosted by CNN in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 27, 2024.
Last December, I had lunch with a friend. We both talked about the upcoming 2024 presidential election and kicked around possible outcomes. One thing we both agreed on is that, come the fall of 2024, we could find ourselves living in a very different world.
Now, here we are, over six months since our lunch, and things are still as much up in the air as they were last December. Biden has locked up the Democratic nomination, and Trump the Republican. So we’re headed for a rematch of the 2020 election, right?
Well, if you’ve followed the news, you already know things aren’t nearly that certain. Donald Trump has been convicted in a New York court of some felony or other and may end up getting tossed in jail. His sentencing date is July 11, a mere 4 days before the Republican National Convention starts in Milwaukee. What if he does receive jail time? Will it affect his nomination? What if Trump wins the White House while in prison?
“This is like the modern version of Amalek. Until they’re (apparently referring to the Palestinians) wiped out, this is just going to go on and on and on and on.”
These were the words of no less an Evangelical light than John MacArthur in an interview with Ben Shapiro.
I’d like to say that MacArthur’s words were a rarity among American Protestants, but they are not. A substantial portion of the American Evangelical church is caught up in the superstition that is dispensationalism, a view of the end times that rose to prominence in the 19th century. For them, dispensationalism is the lens that colors their view of events in the Middle East. And so great is that coloring that they end up supporting anti-liberty political Judaism while destroying the Biblical system of political Protestantism set up by their forebears.
I’m not an expert on John MacArthur’s views on the end times, but I did find this article that seems to be consistent with his statement to Ben Shapiro. In it, MacArthur calls himself a “leaky dispensationalist,” by which he seems to mean that he’s not one of those crazy sorts of dispensationalists but is of a more rational spirit. Very well. But for all that, his stance on how Israel should conduct the war in Gaza, and by implication America’s obligation to support Israel’s war efforts, is not much different than Zionist wingnuts like Sen. Lindsey Graham, who called for Israel to nuke Gaza[1] or Nikki Haley writing “finish them” on an Israeli shell.[2]
What I find interesting about men such as MacArthur is that they continue to push the position that the American people have a God-given responsibility to ask “how high” every time the Israel lobby commands them and their elected officials to jump. By their words and actions, they show that they believe that the American people are, in fact, subordinate to the Israelis based on their warped interpretation of eschatology.
Take, for example, the Israel lobby’s attack on the First Amendment. At the behest of Jewish Zionists,[3] the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill called the Antisemitism Awareness Act that would, in effect, make all criticism of Israel and Jews illegal on college campuses.[4] Given the antisemitism laws in effect in Europe and Canada, it’s reasonable that the Israel lobby won’t be satisfied with quashing all criticism of Israel and Jews only on college campuses. They will work to impose such laws on American society at large, the First Amendment notwithstanding.
The First Amendment prohibits Congress from establishing a church, abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government. It is among the crowning achievements of political Protestantism. The First Amendment guarantees that Christians have the right to proclaim the gospel of Justification by Faith (Belief) Alone. If faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God, then, of course, freedom of speech is critical to the spread of the gospel. And since spiritual liberty begets political and economic liberty, free speech is also necessary to the creation and maintenance of our republic and the rights guaranteed under our Constitution.
So why do John MacArthur and others, instead of taking the side of political Protestantism as they should, prefer instead to support Zionism, which is an expression of political Judaism? Political Judaism lacks the necessary ideas to create or sustain a free society. Do these Christian Zionists not understand that Zionism and our God-given liberties protected by our Constitution are incompatible?
In the New Testament, we have several clear examples of what those who adhere to political Judaism think about free speech. They hate it. They had Christ crucified because they didn’t like his sermons. Even before the crucifixion, there were attempts on Jesus’s life simply for what he said.
The Sanhedrin beat Peter and John for what? For preaching the gospel. The Sanhedrin didn’t believe in freedom of speech. In 2024, the modern-day Sanhedrin in the form of the ADL, AIPAC, and other Jewish organizations and individuals[5] likewise do not believe in free speech and call for college kids and professors who protest Israel to be beaten, suspended, doxed, and prevented from working. They are political thugs whose ideas and actions are incompatible with a free society. Many Christians, who, like the Sanhedrin, also do not believe in freedom of speech, agree. But the Constitution, an expression of political Protestantism, says that college students have the right to peacefully protest Israel.
Political Judaism says, “Don’t say that, or we’ll throw you in jail.” Why do American Protestants fail to take their own side by defending political Protestantism’s principle of free speech? Why do they side with political Judaism against the commands of Scripture and their own best interests? A big part of the answer is their foolish and unscriptural dispensationalist eschatology.
Other Protestants, seeing the problems with political Judaism, prefer to side with Rome instead. One popular expression of political Romanism is Christian Nationalism, which calls for Protestants to make a grand alliance with Romanism and Eastern Orthodoxy to rebuild Christendom. Christians should not side with political Romanism or Orthodoxy, which, like political Judaism, are forms of unbelief lacking the necessary ideas to create and sustain a free society.
Satan fills this world with all manner of distractions, including false theologies and philosophies designed to fool, if possible, even the elect. It’s time for American Protestants to take Jesus’s words seriously, “Take heed that no man deceive you.”
[3] See this post of X from AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) from May 1, 2024. AIPAC, an organization committed to advancing political Judaism, is delighted at the Antisemitism Awareness Act’s attack on the First Amendment.
[5] One of the most vocal individuals attacking the right to protest Israel is billionaire investor Bill Ackman. Ackman demanded that Harvard University (his alma mater) name the Harvard students blaming Israel for the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023. This is a tactic known as “doxing,” which is “Typically…a malicious act, used against people with whom the hacker disagrees or dislikes. Doxing…is the act of revealing identifying information about someone online, such as their real name, home address, workplace, phone, financial, and other personal information.” (Kaspersky, https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-center/definitions/what-is-doxing). Ackman claims to believe in free speech while at the same time acting like some mafia Don, saying to student protestors, in effect, “You’ll never work in this town again!”
Lux Lucet 