Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Birthright Citizenship’

Trump to end birthright citizenship for illegal aliens on day one.

Some of the best news on the immigration front I’ve ever heard is Donald Trump’s promise to sign an executive order to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens on day one of his term in office. Trump called the practice “ridiculous,” which indeed it is.

Of course, the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State, its frontmen, and other groups with a vested interest in committing treason against the United States of America will howl and scream and beat their breasts in opposition. Expect serious pushback from them, as all these evildoers know full well how important awarding citizenship to the children of illegal aliens born on American soil is to their treasonous, irredentist immigration assault on America.

Trump vows to end birthright citizenship and pardon US Capitol rioters” by Jude Sheerin, BBC News, 12/09/2024, accessed 12/10/2024.

Read Full Post »

“Riding the Beast: ‘I risked my life so my daughter could be born in America'” by Stuart Ramsay, Sky News, Originally published on 06/17/2024 and updated in November 2024, https://news.sky.com/story/riding-the-beast-electric-shocks-beatings-and-brandings-13154409, accessed 11/24/2024.

Read Full Post »

Pregnant foreign nationals staked out in Mexico admit they are looking to cross the United States-Mexico border with “the goal” of securing birthright American citizenship for their anchor babies, a new report details, Breitbart. This is but one facet of Rome’s irredentist immigration assault on America.

Irredentism

“America is a dying nation. I tell the Mexicans when I am down in Mexico to keep on having children, and then to take back what we took from them: California, Texas, Arizona, and then to take the rest of the country as well.”[1]

Irredentism is probably not a word many of us use in our day-to-day conversations, but it’s an important concept when discussing Antichrist’s immigration assault on America. We defined irredentism earlier in this talk. But if you want an example of it, it would be hard-pressed to find one better than the preceding quote from Roman Catholic priest Paul Marx.

Irredentism, Christian J. Pinto tells us, is Jesuit immigration warfare.[2] It is the idea that by flooding America, a historically Anglo-Protestant nation, with millions of Roman Catholic immigrants – whether they are legal or illegal immigrants, it matters not – the popes, cardinals, bishops, priests, and nuns of Rome hope “to secure” America “to [their] holy church.”[3]

Read Full Post »

On May 30 of this year, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign released the following statement, “As part of my plan to secure the border, on Day One of my new term in office, I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that under the correct interpretation of the law, going forward, the future children of illegal aliens will not receive automatic U.S. citizenship.” 

Trump continued, “My policy will choke off a major incentive for continued illegal immigration, deter more migrants from coming, and encourage many of the aliens Joe Biden has unlawfully let into our country to go back to their home countries.” You can read Trump’s full statement here.

This is an excellent statement from Trump. A critic may raise the point that Trump talked about this as part of his 2016 campaign, but never pursued the issue seriously during his term in office.  That’s a fair criticism, one that I share.  But his inaction during his first term in office doesn’t negate the truth of what he said in his press release.  Further, as far as I’m aware, no other current Republican candidate has made a statement on birthright citizenship reform. 

Under the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment, the children born on American soil to illegal aliens, birth tourists, foreign students, etc. are granted the status of American citizens, regardless of the citizenship or immigration status of their parents.  In other words, it is foreigners, not the American people, who determine who becomes a citizen and who does not.  This situation is entirely unacceptable to anyone who believes in the principles of Westphalian sovereignty established under the Peace of Westphalia, in which the nation-state was established as the highest form of government, where each nation-state was treated like a legal person in international law, and where the people of each nation-state could order their own internal affairs as it saw fit.

I’ve written on the issue of birthright citizenship (BRC) reform in the past, but it has been a while and the importance of the issue remains.  For these reasons, I’ve decided to write a series on this topic.  In this author’s opinion, reforming BRC to remove the nation-destroying incentives that encourage foreigners to violate American immigration law is the single most important legal step needed to end Rome’s illegal alien invasion of the United States.  Note, I do not say that it’s the only legal step needed, but it is the most important one.  It’s more important than building a wall, which was the primary immigration initiative of the first Trump administration.  You could argue that reforming BRC is, in effect, a sort of internal, invisible, legal wall. 

The logic of BRC reform is simple, if you remove a huge incentive for illegal immigration, you’re going to get less illegal immigration. 

Read Full Post »

Visa

Q. 62. What is the visible church?

A. The visible church is a society made up of all such as in all ages and places of the world do profess the true religion, and of their children.

Westminster Larger Catechism

Last week it was announced that the U.S. State Department had adopted a new rule governing the issuance of category B nonimmigrant visas.  The rule, which took effect on Friday, Jan. 24, is aimed at reducing birth tourism.  Birth tourism is the practice of expectant mothers traveling to the United States to give birth on U.S. soil for the purpose of acquiring American citizenship for their children.

For those of us who have advocated for reform of America’s disastrous immigration laws in a way that protects the legitimate interest of American citizens, this was a welcomed, if limited, victory.  It is a welcomed victory in that, in the words of the State Department document outlining the ruling, “This rule will help prevent operators in the birth tourism industry from profiting off treating U.S. citizenship as a commodity, sometimes through potentially criminal acts…”  It is a limited victory in that it leaves open the larger, more important question, of birthright citizenship.  Specifically, the question of to whom birthright citizenship properly applies.

In the opinion of this author, birthright citizenship properly applies only to children born to parents, either both, or at least one of them, possessing American citizenship.  The notion that a child can rightfully acquire American citizenship by virtue of being born on American soil, regardless of the citizenship status of the parents, is foreign both to the Bible and, in the view of this author, to the Constitution.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Birthright Citizenship

Last week I happened across a report about a woman by the name of Dongyuan Li, a Chinese national, who “pleaded guilty…to federal criminal charges for running an Orange County-based ‘birth tourism’ business that catered to wealthy pregnant clients and Chinese government officials, charging them tens of thousands of dollars to help them give birth in the United States so  their children would get U.S. citizenship.”  You can read the full article here.

Running a birth tourism business, while illegal, is certainly profitable.  According to the article, Li “charged each customer between $40,000 and $80,000” and “received $3 million in international wire transfers from China in two years.”  The piece goes on to note that “As part of her plea agreement, Li agreed to forfeit more than $850,000, a Murrieta residence worth more than $500,000, as well as several Mercedes-Benz vehicles.”

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Apostle Paul_Citizenship

The Apostle Paul declares his Roman citizenship, anon. 2008.

Then the commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?”

He said, “Yes.”

The commander answered, “With a large sum I obtained this citizenship.”

And Paul said, “But I was born a citizen” (Acts 22:27-28).

Hamartano is a Greek verb, which is rendered in English translations of the New Testament as “sin.” But in classical Greek usage it more commonly meant “miss the mark.”

For example, one classical Greek writer gave an account of a hunting party that went out to slay a wild boar. Among the hunters were the king’s son and a rather ambitious courtier. The hunters finally cornered the boar, and the courtier, apparently eager to get credit for the kill, threw his spear and missed, instead striking the king’s son and killing him.

That, as they say, was a bad career move.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Ruth_and_Naomi_Leave_Moab

Ruth and Naomi Leave Moab, 1860, by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld (1794-1872).

Of all political issues, immigration is perhaps the one most likely to elicit strong emotions from all sides of the political spectrum. For this reason alone it is important that we be careful to define our terms. For my part, I find that seeking to be precise in my language is an effective hedge against allowing emotion to cloud my judgment.

In today’s post I would like to tackle one of the most important, and at the same time one of the least examined, aspects of the immigration debate: According to Scripture, by what method or methods does someone become a citizen?

The answer to this question will have a significant impact on our understanding of what the Bible teaches about immigration.

What is a Citizen?

It’s been said, truly I might add, that if you don’t define your terms, you don’t know what you’re talking about. So let’s begin by asking this question, What is a citizen? My Webster’s Seventh Edition give the following,

  • an inhabitant of a city or town; esp : one entitled to the rights and privileges of a freeman
  • a member of a state
  • a native or naturalized person who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to reciprocal protection from it
  • a civilian as distinguished from a specialized servant of the state

Of these four definitions, the third “a native or naturalized person who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to reciprocal protection from it” will be the sense in which I use the term “citizen” in this post.

(more…)

Read Full Post »