Lux Lucet

They have taught their tongue to speak lies; They weary themselves to commit iniquity.

    – Jeremiah 9:5

Miss two weeks, miss a lot. That’s how it is when you track the evil work of Antichrist. Mind you, I’m not speaking about all the evil the Pope and his minions are up to. God alone knows this. For the moment, I speak only of the evil work he and his ministers are doing on the immigration front. And that’s only here in the America!

Yes, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State are up to their usual immigration treachery as they continue their attempt to destabilize America by flooding the nation with bogus asylum seekers and welfare migrants, most of whom are themselves Roman Catholics.

More than any other institution, it is the Roman Catholic Church-State that is responsible for the mess on America’s southern border. One could liken Rome to the arsonist who first sets you house on fire, pretends to be the hero by showing up in a fire truck to douse the blaze, and then lectures you for your supposed lack of fire safety precautions.

Rome’s scan works like this. First, representatives of the Mystery Babylon cynically encourage people to violate US immigration law, often at great personal risk to themselves. Then, when something bad happens to one of their pawns, Rome sends its representatives to primp and preen before the cameras to lecture and to shame Americans about how it’s all their fault due to their supposed lack of Christian charity. Finally, in light of the most recent border tragedy Rome renews demands for the federal government to divert even more taxpayer funds to solve the humanitarian crisis Rome created in the first place. Naturally, “solving the humanitarian crisis” means letting more migrants in faster and, once they get here, giving them even more free stuff paid for by Americans.

Of course, the USCCB is very careful during this whole process to make clear that they believe that nations do have a right to regulate their borders, except when, “such control… is exerted merely for the purpose of acquiring additional wealth” (Strangers No Longer, 33). But oddly enough, every time the Trump administration attempts to do something that’s actually effective at ending the abuse of American citizens at the hands of the Pope’s welfare migrant hordes, Rome cries foul. Quite obviously, the claims of the USCCB, and of other individuals and organizations within the Roman Church-State, that it believes that nations have a right to regulate their borders is a fig leaf to cover their real agenda, which is to break America and to initiate world government through mass welfare migration.

This scam is not unique to America. Rome does the exact same thing in Europe, where the Pope has openly conspired with leaders such as Germany’s Angela Merkel to push a mass migration from the Middle East and Africa, a program which is clearly at odds with the best interests, not only of the German people, but of the people of the other EU nations.

As in all other matters, when Rome’s representatives speak concerning immigration, they do so with a tongue they’ve taught to speak lies.

In support of these claims, I’d like to walk through three recent press releases by the USCCB concerning the migrant crisis on America’s southern border.

June 26, 2019

A few weeks back, Americans were treated to a sad, tragic really, picture of a father and his daughter lying dead, face down in the Rio Grande river where they had drowned while attempting to enter the United States illegally.

In response, the USCCB issued a press release with the headline “U.S. Bishops’ President And Committee Chairman Say Horrific Death Of Father And Daughter At Border And Appalling Conditions For Children Are Cries That Reach Heaven Itself.”

In this post, the bishops show themselves at their garment rending best. “This image [the picture of the dead father and daughter] silences politics,” they tell us. But oddly enough, after insisting that politics has been silenced by the sad image, the bishops immediately start politicking.

First, they attempt to shame Americans for supposedly mistreating children in border detention facilities. Then they quickly follow up this claim by stating that, “Congress has a duty to provide additional funding to address the needs of children in federal custody.”

Completely absent from this press release is any hint that the father might bear responsibility for what happened. This was a man who deliberately put his young daughter’s life at risk while committing the act of attempting to illegally enter the United States. What kind of father does this to his child? He most certainly is to blame for his daughter’s death. Her blood is on his hands.

By their attempt to shift blame from the father to American’s and their elected representatives, the USCCB speaks lies.

Further, nowhere in this press release is any hint that the USCCB may deserve some of the blame for these sad deaths. But it most certainly does. For decades, representatives of the Roman Church-State have used the people of Central America as pawns to further their political aspirations in America.

In his remarkable article “Romanizing America Through Illegal Immigration,” Pastor Ralph Ovadal quoted Romanist priest Paul Marx saying, “America is a dying nation. I tell the Mexicans when I am down in Mexico to keep on having children, and then to take back what we took from them: California, Texas, Arizona, and then to take the rest of the country as well.”

In Strangers No Longer, the bishops even admit themselves that “clandestine [illegal] border crossings” are “often fraught with uncertainties and even dangers” (45). Yes, when you break the law, you’re setting yourself up for bad things to happen. That’s just what Paul told the Romans, “But if you do evil, be afraid [of the civil magistrate].”

But does the USCCB take a strong stand, telling those who contemplate making an illegal run for the border not to do it? No they do not. Again, according to Strangers no Longer, “As migrants leave their homes, pastoral counseling should be offered to help them to better understand these realities [the dangers of illegal border crossings] and to consider alternative options, including the exploration of available legal means of immigration” (45).

The USCCB then goes on to talk about all the things that need to be provided to migrants along the way: prayer books, guides to social and religious services, reminders that to the migrants that they are “evangelizers.” Nowhere to the bishops tell their people, “Don’t violate American immigration law.” Their stance is essentially this, “If you can get in to America by legal means, great. But if not, just go ahead and crash the border.”

Very clearly, the USCCB is encouraging Catholic migrants to disregard American law and their own safety to get across the border.

The USCCB is cynically using these people as foot soldiers in its attempt to Romanize America. If they make it, great! More Roman Catholics to fill their pews and vote for socialist Democrats. If they die in the process, well, that’s beneficial as well. Then they can use the occasion to beat their breasts, rend their garments and blame the American people for the tragedy they created.

July 2, 2019

“U.S. Bishop Chairmen Affirm SCOTUS Decision And Urge That All People Count And Should Be Included In Census,” was the triumphant headline of the USCCB’s July 2 press release. Wrote the Bishop’s

We affirm last week’s decision by the Supreme Court that the inclusion of a citizenship question must ensure genuine reasons for such inclusion. We reaffirm that all persons in the United States should be counted in the Census regardless of their immigration status and reemphasize our judgment that questions regarding citizenship should not be included in the Census. We hope that this view will prevail, whether by administrative action or judicial determination.

The Supreme Court’s ruling against the Trump administration’s move to include a citizen question on the upcoming 2020 census was widely seen as a surprise. Asking census respondents whether they were US citizens has been done in the past, so putting the citizenship question on the 2020 census is hardly unprecedented. Nevertheless, the Court ruled against the Trump administration.

Now a few things need to be said about the comments of the USCCB. In the first place, of course they affirm the Court’s decision. The Church-State has no desire for Americans to find out the extent to which their nation has been compromised by the flood of immigrants, migrants and refugees over the past five decades, a situation the blame for which can be laid at the feet of Rome herself.

Second, where does the Supreme Court get the authority to say that the 2020 census can’t contain a citizenship question. There is no prohibition against such question in the Constitution. Indeed, the federal census asks many questions which no one objects to. Yet asking people if they are citizens is somehow unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts rejected the question, because, he argued, the administration did not give a good enough reason to include the question. This is absurd. If there is no constitutional prohibition against a citizenship question, then the administration does not need a permission slip from the Supreme Court to put one on the census

Third, adding the citizenship question does not prohibit anyone from being counted. When asked if he’s a citizen, a non-citizen would simply check the “No” box. If someone is afraid to answer the question because he’s breaking the law, and therefore ducks responding to the census at all and is not counted, that is his problem, not that of the American public. “For rulers are not a terror to good works, but evil,” wrote the apostle Paul. If someone is breaking our immigration laws and is afraid to respond to the census, good The solution is simple: Stop breaking the law, honor the government as the Fifth Commandment requires, and go back to your home county.

Fourth, removing the citizenship question from the census helps the USCCB in its goal of subverting the United States by skewing Congressional representation in favor of liberal, migrant friendly states. Not many people realize this, but the House of Representatives is apportioned based on the total population of each state, illegal aliens included.

As Steven Camarota noted in a 2005 article,

Immigration has a significant effect on the distribution of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives for three reasons. First, seats are apportioned based on each state’s total population relative to the rest of the country, including illegal aliens and other non-citizens. This, of course, is the issue at the center of Congresswomen Miller’s proposal. Second, congress has chosen to allow in a large number of legal immigrants and to tolerate wide spread illegal immigration. After the 2000 Census, the average congressional district had roughly 650,000 people. Thus, the more than 18 million non-citizens in the 2000 Census were equal to nearly 29 congressional seats. The third reason is that non-citizens are not evenly distributed throughout the country. In 2000, half of all non-citizens lived in just three states and almost 70 percent live in just six states. States with a large non-citizen population will gain at the expense of states comprised mostly of citizens (“The Impact of Non-Citizens on Congressional Apportionment,” CIS, December 6, 2005).

Did you catch that? The 18 million non-citizens in the 2000 Census were equal to 29 congressional seats. Further, since 70 percent of all non-citizens lived in just six states, their large numbers and heavy concentration in a few states means that those states pick up congressional representation at the expense of states without large non-citizen populations. Since these tend to be liberal states, the balance of congressional power is being shifted away from more conservative to more liberal states largely due to mass illegal immigration. According to Camarota, the shift accounted for nearly 29 congressional seats in 2000. I have seen estimates that today the shift is as much as 40 congressional seats.

Put another way, American citizens are having their congressional representation diluted by foreigners.

This is the dirty little secret that the USCCB does not want you to know.

Fourth, concerning the surprise ruling by the Supreme Court, it’s worth noting that Chief Justice John Roberts, considered a conservative, sided with the liberals on the court in the majority opinion. Why would he do that? Any number of reasons could be advanced. But worth noting is that John Roberts is a Roman Catholic. Is this another case of Rome having the right man in the right spot to do its bidding?

July 3, 2019

The USCCB thinks that you, my fellow Americans, are under an obligation to provide housing to illegal aliens. That’s the import of their July 3 press release headlined “U.S. bishops’ Chairmen of Migration And Domestic Justice Express Opposition To Proposed Rule That Would Lead To Family Separation And Housing Instability.”

Translated into less sanctimonious and more honest language, the USCCB thinks that illegal aliens have the inalienable right to force American tax donkeys to pay for their housing.

Under current Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules, mixed-status families (i.e. families some of whose members are citizens or legal residents of the US, and some of whose are not) can live in federal housing projects. In order to receive federal housing assistance, one must prove that he is a US citizen or legal resident. Those who do not prove they are citizens or legal residents – current rules do not required that an individual submit proof of immigration status – are allowed to live in federal housing, but they do not receive a subsidy. Under the proposed rule change, all family members would need to have their immigration status verified. If a person in unable to verify his eligible immigration status, he, “may not serve as head of household or spouse – i.e., the holder of the lease.”

In short, the proposed rule makes it a little harder for illegal aliens to receive federal housing subsidies. This would substantially impact single-parent households with minor children.

Naturally, the USCCB is quick to object, whining, “The proposed rule would have terrible consequences for thousands of mixed-status families. It would force these families to make a heartbreaking choice – endure family separation so that eligible members can continue to receive critical housing assistance or stay together and forfeit any such assistance.”

There’s a third choice the USCCB doesn’t mention: Go home.

The bishop’s continue, “The right to decent, safe, and affordable housing is rooted in the fundamental dignity of every person.” Okay, stop the presses. Where to the bishops get this idea? Certainly not from Scripture, which knows no such thing as a “right to decent, safe, and affordable housing.” This is a figment of the bishop’s imagination, rooted as it is in their incompetent Thomistic economic and political philosophy.

“More must be done to address the housing needs in this country,” writes the USCCB, “but it must not be done at the expense of mixed-status families.” Note the two musts in this sentence. First, more must be done related to housing needs. By whom? By American taxpayers, of course! You see, the USCCB has perfected the art of being charitable with other peoples’ money.

Second, the solution to housing needs must not come at the expense of mixed-status families. Actually, that seems like the most logical place to start. A local case likely illustrates this point.

In March of this year, Claudia Gamas-Mendoza, an illegal immigrant was arrested and charged with endangering her six (or possible four) children who were found alone in her apartment. According to a report from a local TV station, the children, ages are 6, 5, 1 and 3 weeks. “The 5 and 6-year-olds are both mentally delayed and suffer from Christianson Syndrome. Police say the toddler had a full diaper that had not been changed ‘in some time.’ ”

Now, according to this report and one other report on this case I found in the local paper, it appears that there is no father in the picture. I’m making a few assumptions here, but it is very likely that the mother was receiving housing assistance through HUD on behalf of her (four or six) children. Further, the more children she had, the greater her subsidy. Finally, since there was no father present, she almost certainly would have served as the lease holder.

Under the proposed HUD rule changes, she would be unable to serve as the lease holder since she is an illegal alien. This rule change would have removed the perverse incentive to illegally remain in the country and have more children at taxpayer expense, they way current HUD rules permit. Put another way, the HUD rule change the USCCB opposes, would her an others in her position off from receiving welfare benefits and put pressure on them to return to their home countries.

This is exactly what needs to be done.

Better still, the government should get out of the housing business altogether, seeing that there is no Scriptural or constitutional authority for the federal government to provide housing for anyone, including US citizens. And if US citizens are no morally entitled to live off their neighbors, how much less are foreigners, especially foreigners who disrespect our immigration laws?

Closing Thoughts

It has been the contention of this author that the current immigration crisis in America is principally the work of the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State. The principal motive of Rome to push the immigration issue is its desire to weaken and render ungovernable sovereign nation-states with the ultimate goal of instituting a world government headed by the Antichrist pope.

If this weren’t bad enough, most American Protestants are not taught the sound eschatology of the Reformation and have, therefore, been rendered blind to the true nature of the Roman Church-State.

As a result, many Evangelical leaders, knowingly or not, adopt Rome’s arguments concerning immigration as if they were Biblical rather than the doctrines of Rome’s lying tongues.

It is the prayer of this author that the Lord would use this and other posts on immigration to open the eyes of his fellow Christians, not only to the danger our current immigration system poses to America, but also to the danger of the Satanic power that tirelessly advances its immigration lies for the purpose of advancing world-wide tyranny.