My Comment: “It feels like the plan is to push the public into revolt and then crack down and impose total tyranny.” I think the writer’s on to something here. He’s talking about events in Great Britain, but the same thing seems to be going on here in the US. It’s all goad, goad, goad the public with more and more outrageously treasonous behavior and wait for the big blowup. Then comes the big hammer. We already have had a taste of that with the J6 insurrection setup and subsequent prosecutions of normal Americans for wandering around the Capitol. What’s the way out? It’s not grabbing our pitchforks. The answer seems to me that Christians first need to pray for discernment, then get to work. Back federal-level candidates who support the Constitution. But don’t forget about the importance of local candidates who love liberty and who will stand up to tyranny. Matt Trewhella is right, we tend to focus too much on national elections and not enough on local elections. Having principled local officials willing to stand up to tyrannical higher magistrates is the Biblical model. Mob violence is not the answer and simply plays into the hands of the wicked rulers who hate us and want to enslave us.
Jesus would say that we need to turn the other cheek but this is just getting ridiculous. It feels like the plan is to push the public into revolt and then crack down and impose total tyranny. What's the way out? pic.twitter.com/osp2qFuGlw
My Comment: As the globalist Bond villains of World Economic Forum (these are the guys who want you to eat the bugs, own nothing, and be happy) begin their annual meeting at Davos, Switzerland, never forget that the Antichrist Roman Catholic Church-State is right there cheering the work along. And you don’t have to take my word for it. Check out the link below for comments from the Superior General of the Scalabrinian Missionaries taken straight from the Vatican’s own news portal. Rome doesn’t even bother to hide its globalism. It’s right out there in our faces if we have eyes to see.
In Genesis chapter 11, we read about sinful man’s first attempt to build a global empire in disobedience to God in the form of the Tower of Babel. Here, we read, “And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.”
This was in contradiction to the command of God, who reiterated to Noah the same order given to Adam, namely, to be fruitful and to fill the earth (see Genesis 9:1). Rather than obeying God, these men of Babel preferred to “make a name for themselves” by building a city and a tower. We tend to focus on the tower but note well that the plan was to build a city as well as a tower “whose top may reach unto heaven.” The city, of course, implies a permanent dwelling. In this case, a permanent dwelling “of the whole earth,” which is to say the entire population of the earth. This was the world’s first idolatrous, global empire. An empire that God quickly brought to an end, scattering the people “abroad from there over the face of all the earth.” After this, the men of Babel “ceased building the city.”
In his sermon on Mars Hill, the Apostle Paul tells gives us additional information related to why God scattered the men of Babel. He wrote that God “preappointed” the time and boundaries of men’s dwellings. He did this, Paul tells us, “so that they should seek the Lord.” Rather than taking solace and pride in their own achievements, as men of great empires are wont to do, God has decreed that men are to dwell in nations, mind their own business, and seek him.
But sinful man did not learn his lesson at Babel. Over the following millennia, man would make other attempts to constitute a global empire. Some of these attempts are recorded for us in the pages of Scripture. Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Greece, and Rome all took their shots.
Detail from the Tower of Babel by Pieter Bruegel, 1563.
And they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.”
Genesis 11:4
In Genesis chapter 11, we read of man’s first attempt to create an idolatrous, globalist empire. Rather than obeying God’s command to “fill the earth,” a command first given to Adm and Eve and then later repeated to Noah, who himself was a sort of second Adam, they decided to rebel by remaining in one place and making, “a name for themselves” by building, “a tower whose top is in the heavens.”
This first attempt ended badly for the empire builders as God frustrated their plans as he confused their language and, “scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.”
But because of sin man continued to attempt to create empires after his own image and likeness. In the pages of Scripture, we come across the names of many empires, Babylon, Assyria, Greece, and Rome.
But great empires are not a thing of the distant past. The Ottoman Empire – the Ottoman Empire was the successor to the Byzantine Empire, but the Byzantines didn’t call themselves Byzantines, they called themselves Romans; if we accept this, the Roman Empire didn’t fall until 1453 when Constantinople was conquered by the Turks – fell in 1918, barely a century ago. The sun famously never set on the British Empire, which existed within living memory. Although no one calls it an empire, the American Empire of the post-WWII era has dominated the world we live in.
WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 08: Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland testifies before a Senate Foreign Relation Committee hearing on Ukraine on March 08, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
“What does it profit anyone except the very few to whom war means huge profits?”
Brigadier General Smedley D. Butler, USMC, War is a Racket
In his 1930s book War is a Racket, retired U.S. Marine Corps Brigadier General Smedley Butler argued against the globalists and corporatists of his day and for the return of America’s historic foreign policy of non-interventionism.
Some may suppose from the title of his book that Butler, a 30-year Marine Corps veteran and two-time medal of honor recipient, had turned pacifist. Such was not the case. Butler was not a pacifist. He was a non-interventionist in that he held that war was could justifiably be undertaken only for very limited reasons. In Butler’s view, there were only two reasons Americans should go to war. He wrote:
There are only two reasons you should be asked to give your youngsters. One is defense of our homes. The other is the defense of our Bill of Rights and particularly the right to worship God as we see fit. Every other reason advanced for the murder of young men is a racket, pure and simple (War is a Racket, 67).
Put differently, Butler believed that American soldiers should be sent to battle only in defense of their families, their property, and their Constitutionally guaranteed rights. This is essentially the foreign policy of the founding fathers of America.
Worth noting, too, is that Butler mentioned “young men” in his comments, not young women. Feminism had not advanced so far in his day as to make it a philosophical imperative that young women be sent to the frontlines, a barbaric and astonishingly stupid idea advanced both by the U.S. and now (probably due to U.S. influence) Ukrainian army.
And Jesus answered and said unto them, ‘Take heed that no man deceive you.’”
Matthew 24:4
Several times in Scripture, believers are commanded not to be deceived. The quote at the top of this post is just one of them.
Unfortunately, many Christians, or at least those who claim to be Christians, are often deceived by the wiles of the devil. One of the greatest deceptions of our time is the increasing acceptance of the Roman Catholic Church-State (RCCS) as a Christian church and her laymen, priests, nuns, monks, bishops, archbishops, cardinals, and popes as genuine Christians. This deception has its origin in the Antichrist RCCS and has been eagerly promoted by many leading Evangelicals since the end of WWII, with men such as Billy Graham and Charles Colson leading many astray.
The pro-life movement has been one of Rome’s most effective tools for deceiving Protestants and has led many astray. “After all,” so the thinking goes, “if the local archdiocese wants to organize a march against abortion or protest in front of an abortion clinic, why shouldn’t Protestants join their brothers and sisters in Christ in the protest? We’re stronger united than separated.”
But those who think this way go wrong right from the beginning, showing themselves to be deceived about the Church of Rome and its doctrines. The RCCS is not a Christian church, neither are Roman Catholics Christians. This is not something spoken out of spite, be a necessary conclusion drawn from the teachings of Rome herself. The gospel of justification by faith (belief) alone is essential to the Christian faith; Rome denies the gospel of justification by faith (belief) alone; therefore, Rome is not a Christian church. And what does the Bible teach Christians about ecumenical work with unbelievers? “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them” (Ephesians 5:11).
The U.S. is allowing many Afghan refugees to enter the U.S. without visas, relying on an immigration program known as humanitarian parole. Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
“We are Republicans, and don’t propose to leave our party and identify ourselves with the party whose antecedents have been rum, Romanism, and rebellion. We are loyal to our flag.”
Dr. Samuel D. Burchard, Presbyterian Minister and Union Civil War Veteran
“In undertaking this work, I took cognizance of a significant social fact of our time; that, due to enormous financial implications, the phenomenon of emigration will find some relief only in the English -speaking countries. The vast influx of immigrants into Canada and Australia confirms that fact.”
Those are the words of Roman Catholic priest Giulivo Tessarolo, writing in the introduction of a book he edited titled Exsul Familia: The Church’s Magna Charta for Migrants.
As has been covered in the space before, Exsul Familia Nazarethana(EFN) is the 1952 Apostolic Constitution by Pope Pius XII in which he formally laid out the Roman Catholic Church State’s (RCCS) position on migration, immigration, and refugee resettlement. In short, the RCCS believes the more migration, the better.
Why does the RCCS take this stance?
Mass, taxpayer subsidized immigration, migration, and refugee resettlement is a powerful way for globalists – the RCCS is the oldest and premier globalist institution in the world – to destabilize individual nations, break down the Christian system of independent nation states established as a result of the Protestant victory over Rome in the Thirty Years’ War, and institute global government.
I chose to feature Tessarolo’s quote to start this post, because, unlike most statements by officials of the RCCS, Tessarolo’s clearly notes the enormous, implied cost to the receiving nations of the pope’s immigration plans.
In short, the popes of Rome want to destroy independent nation states, impose world government with Rome as the head, all while forcing the citizens of those targeted nations to subsidize their own dispossession. If anyone gets wise to the scheme and objects, Rome or one of its proxies simply denounces him as a “xenophobe” or a “racist” and that individual is either quickly brought to heel or is “cancelled” and driven out of polite society.
That’s a great deal for the occupants of the office of Antichrist. For Americans and citizens of other targeted nations, not so much.
The important point to take away from Tessarolo’s statement is that the RCCS views refugee resettlement as a cost to be dutifully born by the citizens of the receiving nations. In other words, your tax dollars are going to support he RCCS’s plans to destroy your nation.
Put still another way, refugee resettlement is a form of international welfare, the bill for which Antichrist plans to send to you.
Put still another way, refugee resettlement as currently practiced in America and around the world is a welfare racket.
In his classic book War is a Racket, retired US Marine General Smedley Butler wrote, “A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to be to the majority of the people. Only a small ‘inside’ group know what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many” (23).
Wanna be Bond villain and World Economic Forum big shot Klaus Schwab
“The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them, and those who exercise authority over them are called ‘benefactors.’’’
Luke 22:25
A frightening pandemic has the world it its grasp. And no, I don’t mean Covid 19, the Delta variant, or any other Coronavirus.
No.
The pandemic we all face is the terrifying tyranny pandemic. An authoritarian, worldwide, unprecedented, and apparently globalist driven destruction of the civil liberties of the people of the West all, supposedly, to keep us safe from a virus which has a survivability rate of well over 99%.
The virus pandemic, if it even deserves that name, frightens me not in the least.
It’s the tyranny pandemic unleashed by governments in the formerly free world that is terrifying.
Just a couple weeks ago I wrote on this topic. So why return to it? Because the shriek-o-meter of the vaccine propagandists has been cranked up to ear splitting levels that I never thought possible. Even mainstream news channels are openly advocating authoritarianism that only a few years ago would have been unthinkable in America.
According to the version of history I was taught and read, the Nazis lost WWII. But from where I sit, it almost looks as if they won. Why do I say this? Because mor and more in what was formerly considered the free world, something very much like vaccine fascism is rapidly becoming the order of the day. Take France, for example where it’s now “papers, please.” In this case, it’s the vaccine passport that’s being demanded. According to President Emmanuel Macron’s recent edict, French citizens must present proof of vaccination just go about their daily lives doing normal things: going to the movies, dining out, etc. This has sparked a wave of protests in France, such that the government has felt compelled to back down. At least to some extent. But the idea of a vaccine passport is not dead in France.
Certainly, the idea of a vaccine passport is not dead in America. In fact, there’s a certain segment of authoritarians in America that cannot wait to issue edicts like those in France. Just last week, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell threated Americans with lockdowns as if they were disobedient children. Get vaxxed or we’re going back to lockdowns like last year! That was his message.
Lux Lucet 