Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Economics’ Category

A Greek Tragedy

You can’t get very far into the financial news without coming across a story about the European financial crisis. Riots here, bailouts there. Bureaucrats and politicians running hither yon. One day we’re told everything’s solved, nothing to see here. The next day the end of the world draweth nigh. It’s all very entertaining in a perverse sort of way.

But apart from the repetitious, bipolar financial news out of Europe, one thing does stand out about the crisis: the countries at the epicenter of the mess, Greece and Italy. Both these nations are ridiculously indebted as a result of reckless government spending and appear headed toward economic perdition. In other words, they’re really not any different than the rest of the western world, just getting there first.

But these aren’t just any nations. This isn’t Bulgaria we’re talking about. No, as secular scholars will tell you, Greece and Rome were the very cradle of Western civilization. If the West began with Greece and Rome, there’s a good chance it just might end there as well.

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Financial Outlook 2012

Jim Rogers is one of my financial heroes. Not only is he one of the most successful investors in the world, he’s also that ever so rare highly placed individual who 1) knows what he is talking about, and 2) is honest and brave enough to publically speak the truth. I had heard of him years before the 2008 financial crisis, but only as the events of that fall unfolded did I really pay attention to him. What impressed me so much was that as the whole financial system was coming unglued, Jim Rogers was one of the few calm, sane voices on Wall Street. Unlike the entire financial and political establishment, he denounced at every opportunity and to anyone who would listen the morally indefensible bailouts of Wall Street, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac in clear language a normal person could understand. Imagine that! A financial guy who speaks clear English.

Another nice thing about Jim Rogers is that he does a lot of interviews. He is a regular guest on American and foreign financial television shows, and he recently did an interview for an Australian TV network in which he discussed his financial forecast for 2012. I don’t know whether Rogers is a Christian, but his views on monetary policy, taxes and government are certainly consistent with the Bible.

Consider what Rogers says to a question posed by interviewer Lelde Smits regarding his outlook for global economic growth in 2012 ,

“Well Lelde, I’m not too optimistic about what’s going to be happening in the world in the next two or three years, and maybe even longer. We have serious problems in the United States. you know, in 2002 we had an economic slowdown, 2008 was even worse because the debt was so much higher. The next time around the debt is going to be staggeringly higher. So, the problems are going to continue to get worse until somebody solves the basic underlying problem of too much spending and too much debt.”     

This is exactly right. The 2008 financial crisis was brought on as a result of too much spending and debt. To cure this debt and spending problem, our dysfunctional political leaders – with intellectual cover provided by quack academic economists – decided to send the nation further into debt by a combination of money printing and deficit spending. It was Keynesianism on steroids.

The book of 1 Kings records a confrontation between the prophets of Baal and Elijah. When Baal did not heed the cries of the false prophets to consume the sacrifice on the altar, the Baal worshippers doubled down on their foolish leaping, shouting and gashing themselves, somehow desperately believing that Baal would hear them if only they could shout loudly enough. In the end, they just looked ridiculous.

And as is was with the prophets of Baal, so it is with our contemporary high priests of Keynesianism. They demand ever more money printing, government boondoggle spending and debt, hoping against hope that somehow the absurd act of piling more debt on top of an economy already being crushed by too much debt will fix things. But in the end, just like the prophets of Baal, the Keynesian quacks in charge of our monetary and fiscal policies will just end up looking ridiculous. Of course, they may bring the whole economy crashing down around us too, a feat well beyond the power of any mere prophet of Baal.

To read more of Jim Rogers’ cogent economic and investing forecast for the coming year, please click here.

Read Full Post »

The Coming Debt Disaster

Assuredly I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny. (Matt. 5:26)

Debt. The entire western world is drowning in it. The current US is about $15 trillion, and that’s not counting the unfunded liabilities such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc. Depending on whom you talk to, when those programs future liabilities are added in, the national debt balloons to many tens of trillions of dollars. Europe is a mess. Greece is bankrupt, as are Italy, Portugal, Spain and Ireland, the so-called PIIGS. Japan has a debt to GDP (Gross Domestic Product) ratio of over 200%.

So what do western governments do when they’ve maxed out their credit cards? Not what you and I would do. We’d be forced to cut back on our spending and payoff our debts. But not the folks in Washington, Brussels and Tokyo. No sir. When governments are facing bankruptcy, they simply create a new line a credit for themselves through the magic – fraud would be a better term – of quantitative easing. For the uninitiated, this is central banker speak for inflation, or to put it another way, money printing.

There once was a time when this country was on the gold standard. A dollar was defined as a certain weight of gold or silver. Today, no one knows what a dollar is. The term is meaningless. It’s definition, whatever. This is bad for you and me, but good for the parasite class in Washington and the phony, crony capitalists on Wall Street.
(more…)

Read Full Post »

Natural Born Capitalists

According to an article posted on CNBC, kids are natural born capitalists. The article quotes the abstract from a psychological study that supports this view. The abstract reads,

Rather than being learned from parents, a concept of property rights may automatically grow out of 2- to 3-year-olds’ ideas about bodily rights, such as assuming that another person can’t touch or control one’s body for no [sic] reason, Friedman proposed…

Friedman’s team presented a simple quandary to 40 preschoolers, ages 4 and 5, and to 44 adults. Participants saw an image of a cartoon boy holding a crayon who appeared above the word “user” and a cartoon girl who appeared above the word “owner.” After hearing from an experimenter that the girl wanted her crayon back, volunteers were asked to rule on which cartoon child should get the prized object.

About 75 percent of 4- and 5-year-olds decided in favor of the owner, versus about 20 percent of adults.

Hmmm…I hate to admit this, but it appears Hillary Clinton may have been partially right: it takes a village – not to mention expensive, long-term indoctrination in “institutions of learning”- to raise a socialist.

As Scripturalists (those Christians who hold that the Bible has a monopoly on truth), we look on studies of this sort with a certain amusement. On one hand, the study does nothing to prove that the children are right and the adults wrong. Moral principles are never established by scientific experimentation. But while science – whether psychology or any other science – does not establish truth, it can at times present its largely atheist devotees with a well-deserved poke in the eye. At the very least, it has to be galling to all the central planners out there who recoil at the thought that someone, somewhere, in some way is using his property in a manner not regulated or approved by the masters of the universe.

Of course rather than explaining the children’s good sense of right and wrong as originating in their idea of bodily rights (where this idea comes from the abstract does not say), Christians would argue that the children’s moral sense is a result of their being made in the image of God, their minds lighted by Christ, “That was the true light which gives light every man coming into the world” (Jn.1:9). That light tells us negatively that theft is wrong, “You shall not steal,” (Ex.20:15) and positively that an owner has the right to use his property, “Is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with my own things” (Matt. 20:15)?

Yes, I know this is a hard pill for the various and sundry collectivists, fascists, central planners and professional busybodies who run our country and delight in lording their authority over others, but Jesus is a capitalist and the Bible is a capitalist document. And children, it seems, understand the morality of capitalism better than most adults.

Read Full Post »

The Power of Ideas

Here’s a quote from someone I’m not at all inclined to cite favorably, nevertheless the following is an excellent point,

[T]he ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back. – John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, p.683.

Too often Christians dismiss the intellect and elevate feelings, what they call the heart, to a place of prominence. But the Bible knows nothing about a heart/head dichotomy. In the Bible, the heart and the head, or better, the heart and the mind are the same thing. Paul tells us we have the mind of Christ. John tells us that it is Christ the Logos, or Logic of God who lightens our minds. As Christians, therefore, we ought to have at least as much appreciation for the power of ideas as the pagan Keynes.

Read Full Post »

The politicians keep on fueling an illusion that you can spend yourself out of the misery, and that by printing money you will improve the economy which is not the case. – Marc Faber

Whatever their nature, all debts must be paid. This is a basic feature of God’s creation and one that reflects his character. We see this in Romans where Paul described God as both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. Sin put us in God’s debt, and his justice demands payment, a payment no sinful son of Adam can ever make. God doesn’t wink at our sins, he doesn’t let us file bankruptcy or default. Our sin debt must be paid, either by our eternal condemnation or by the blood of his Son Jesus Christ. This is a simple point, an elementary point, a point that a child can understand. And yet this simple point often causes us to stumble. We want to believe that there really is a free lunch.

This wishful thinking isn’t limited to our sin problem, but shows up in how we think about more mundane areas such as fiscal and monetary policy. The United States, and indeed the whole western world, has incurred an enormous monetary debt because people believe in free lunches, that is, they think that debts do not have to be paid.

One of the few prominent investors who gets the debt issue is Marc Faber. I don’t know whether he’s a Christian, but his understanding about debt is certainly consonant with Scripture. We cannot spend our way out of debt, that’s a Keynesian lie. Our debt, he tells us, must be paid. That’s not the line the folks from Washington, Wall Street or Main Street want to hear, but it is the truth. Check out this video interview with Faber.


Read Full Post »

For a long time now I’ve followed Lewrockwell.com.  It’s a libertarian blog touting Austrian economics and anarcho-libertarian politics.  Now while I don’t count myself a libertarian – libertarianism does not take its ethics, politics or economics from Scripture, the requirement for a Scripturalist – and cannot endorse the anarchism advocated by the site, I do appreciate its stand for individual liberty and against big government.

That being said, I’ve always found it odd that a website dedicated to “anarcho-capitalism” as they like to call it would attempt to defend the principles of anarchy and capitalism by using the philosophy of the Roman Catholic Church-State, for Romanist dogma supports neither.  First, Romanist political theory is certainly not friendly toward libertarian anarchy, or for that matter even sober, Biblical constitutional government.  Rather, Rome’s political doctrine of subsidiarity – “according to which, ‘a community of a higher order should not interfere in the internal life of a community of a lower order, depriving the latter of its functions, but rather should support it in case of need and help co-ordinate itsactivities with the rest of society, always with a view to the common good’ ” – is hierarchical and interventionist in the extreme.  

And while its political theory tends toward fascism, Rome’s economic thought is just as oppressive.  In its 1994 Catechism, Rome rails against capitalism by stating,

She [Rome] has likewise refused to accept, in the practice of “capitalism,” individualism and the absolute primacy of the marketplace over human labor…regulating it [the economy] solely by the law of the marketplace fails social justice, for ‘there are many human needs which cannot be satisfied by the market.’ Reasonable regulation of the marketplace and economic initiatives, in keeping with a just hierarchy of values and a view to the common good, is to be commended.   – Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2425.   

Rome, ignoring Christ’s teaching about private property”is it not lawful for me to do what I wish with my own things?,” posits “reasonable regulation of the marketplace” – reasonable in whose eyes? – as a preferable alternative to the Biblical economic model of laissez-faire capitalism.

Yet for all this, there are many articles on Lewrockwell.com that attempt to cast Romanism in the role of defender of liberty and Protestantism as its foe.  For example, libertarian stalwart Murray Rothbard, citing Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn’s book Liberty or Equality, approvingly sums up Kuehnelt-Leddihn’s argument in an article posted on the website by stating that the book’s,

main gist…is the thesis that Catholicism makes for a libertarian spirit (albeit “anti-democratic”) while Protestantism makes for socialism, totalitarianism, and a collectivist spirit.

Yes of course, we all know how collectivist those Calvinist colonialists were.  Writing in a book review, Rothbard slanders the English Reformation as “The Cultural Revolution in 16th Century England,” and advances the idea that the English Reformers were nothing but a bunch of Protestant bullies who beat up helpless and saintly monks, bishops and cardinals, stripped their altars and stole their lunch money. 

Roman Catholic Thomas Woods regularly advances the idea that Romanism and capitalism are compatible systems and has even written a book on the subject titled The Church and the Market

Now I can have some sympathy for a freedom-minded Roman Catholic scholar who constantly must struggle with the cognitive dissonance arising from the clash of his capitalist principles and the social teaching of the Roman Catholic Church-State.  His is not a fate to be envied. But my sympathy is limited.  For such a man is double minded, refusing to see the screaming contradiction between capitalism and the oppressive economic dogma of Rome.  As James tells us, let not such a man expect that he will receive anything of the Lord.  He is unstable in all his ways.

Read Full Post »

The central bank?  Abolish the central bank.  Who needs a central bank?  – Jim Rogers

A few years ago when I finally decided to get serious and learn about investing and economics, I had no trouble finding outlets that offered information and advice.  But there was a problem with the supposed helpful hints and trenchant analysis put forth in the mainstream financial media:  it was a perfect cacophony of contradictory nonsense. To wit:  Destroying perfectly good automobiles is good for the economy, but saving money by driving a clunker is un-American.  If consumers go on a spending spree and max out their credit cards, this is good for the economy.  If consumers act responsibly and pay down their debts, it’s the end of the world as we know it.  A strong dollar is bad for America, but devaluing the dollar and thus the cash savings of the American people is good policy. Capitalism is what makes America great.  We must have socialistic bailouts of GM and Wall Street to save capitalism.  Gold and Silver are in a bubble, but municipal bonds issued by nearly bankrupt governments are a great buy.  The nation’s current financial crisis came about because people couldn’t pay their mortgage debt.  In order to solve our current financial crisis, the nation must go further into debt.  When investment bankers make large profits due to their financial acumen, they deserve to earn large bonuses.  When investment bankers suffer massive losses due to their financial incompetence, they deserve to earn large bonuses.  The worst financial scandals in American history have come during the period of greatest government regulation.  If it weren’t for government regulation, the country would be rife with financial fraud. 

I could go on, but I think I’ve made my point:  searching for financial wisdom in the mainstream press is a lot like snipe hunt.  This should come as no surprise, for the minds of those who opine in the financial press are largely governed by the foolish ideas of this world.  That’s what makes it so refreshing to hear someone who speaks clearly with insight and understanding on the subject of investing.  And one of the best at brining clarity to financial matters is Jim Rogers.  I first came to admire his work during the fall of 2008.  At a time when it was all but impossible to find anyone who had anything intelligent to say about the collapse of the equities markets, Jim Rogers was on CNBC and any other outlet that would have him preaching the simple, understandable, ethical gospel of capitalism.  That is not to say that Jim Rogers is a Christian.  I don’t know what he thinks of Christ.  He is, I believe, and Austrian as touching economics.  And while Austrian economics is not Christian economics, the main tenants of Austrian economics are consistent with the Bible.  In addition to being sound in his thinking, Rogers is one of the clearest speakers on investing and economics I have heard.  It’s amazing, but you actually can listen to and understand a Jim Rogers interview without having a graduate degree in finance.

Here’s a blog dedicated to Rogers quotes.  Also, be sure to check out the following Jim Rogers interview.

Read Full Post »

Not so very long ago the thought of buying gold and silver seemed unthinkable.  I didn’t know very much about investing,  and the little I did know came from studying my one and only underperforming, large cap mutual fund.  To me, the bond market seemed like foreign territory, so the thought of investing in precious metals was about as  far off my radar screen as it could be.    

That started to change in 2007, when after becoming convinced of the worsening financial condition of the US and the distinct possibility that the powers that be would try to monetize the government’s debts – by monetize I simply mean create new dollars out of nothing by a process the academic frauds who run our nation’s financial institutions call Quantitative Easing, thus destroying the value of the existing dollars in your checking and savings account  – I finally started to seriously consider investing in gold and silver, and over the past three years I’ve become much more comfortable with the metals.  

Maybe you’re like I was in 2007, intrigued by precious metals but unsure whether it’s a good investment.  Does it make sense to invest in gold and silver?  How would I go about doing it?  What dangers should I be aware of?  If you’re asking these questions, that’s ok.  In fact, if you’re not asking these questions before investing, you’re disrespecting your hard-earned, God-given capital.  So before putting any money into silver and gold, it’s best to learn why and how you should buy. 

The key to this is finding a good mentor.  One of the best I have found in the field of precious metals is James Turk.  He’s a  sober-minded investor with decades of experience in finance and precious metals.  I find his writing clear and easy to understand, even for novice investors, and his forecasts of the price movements of gold and silver have been remarkably accurate.  His 2004 book The Collapse of the Dollar and How to Profit from it is a good place to start for learning about the silver and gold markets.  In the first half of the book, Turk makes his case for why the dollar will collapse: it’s a government fiat currency with an unlimited potential supply.  The second half of focuses on gold and silver investing and provides helpful information on how to purchase both the physical metals and also gold mining stocks.  There’s also a disturbing chapter dealing with the specter of government confiscation of not only gold, but also Americans’ retirement savings.  You can find used copies of The Collapse of the Dollar for a few bucks on Amazon or other internet booksellers.  Think of it as one of the better low-cost investments you’ll make in the new year.

Click here for a recent audio interview with Turk by Eric King of King World News.

Read Full Post »

Walter Williams has long been an intellectual hero to me.  I first started reading his stuff back in the day when I was in college and in short order found myself completely hooked.  What grabbed me was how Dr. Williams – he’s an economics professor at George Mason University – would start with a few simple ideas and with rigorous logic apply them to the popular nostrums of the day.  The nostrums didn’t stand a chance.  Race and gender quotas, environmentalism, deficit spending, social welfare programs,  bureaucratic regulation, and political correctness all fell before his pen.  I was stunned.  In many ways reading his columns began the process of reclaiming my mind after many years spent detesting anything intellectual.   

John Robbins also respected Dr. Williams’ work.  Writing in a book review in The Freeman, Robbins stated about Dr. Williams that,

In an age of philosophical and moral relativism and BOMFOG (the ubiquitous and false platitudes about unity in the brotherhood of man and fatherhood of God), Dr. Williams’s honesty and analysis may be painful for some delicate souls. “Regardless of whose sensibilities are offended,” he writes, “I do not hesitate to call things as I see them. Why? Because I care about our country and fear for its future as a free and prosperous nation.” More importantly, Dr. Williams cares about truth.

 Dr Williams cares about the truth.  That’s high praise indeed.  If you haven’t read Dr. Williams work, you’re in for a treat.  Here’s a good example to get you started.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »