Pearl Harbor is not the only recent deception to lead America into war.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident on August 5, 1964, was used by President Lyndon Johnson to propel America into a much deeper engagement in Vietnam, a war that would kill some 58, 000 American servicemen and millions of Vietnamese. While widely believed at the time, many have come to question the veracity of the Gulf of Tonkin incident in which it was claimed that North Vietnamese gunboats had twice attacked the American destroyer, the Maddox.
Some may recall Admiral James Stockdale, who was Ross Perot’s vice-presidential running mate in 1992. He was a Navy pilot in 1964 and was flying overhead at the time the attack on the Maddox supposedly took place. Said Stockdale, ““I had the best seat in the house to watch that event, and our destroyers were just shooting at phantom targets — there were no PT boats there…. There was nothing there but black water and American fire power.”
According to one article, “In 1965, Lyndon Johnson commented: ‘For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.’“
Tom Wells, author of the book The War Within: America’s Battle Over Vietnam has commented that American media, “described the air strikes that Johnson launched in response [to the Gulf of Tonkin incident] as merely `tit for tat’ — when in reality they reflected plans the administration had already drawn up for gradually increasing its overt military pressure against the North.”
If Tom Wells is right, the supposed attack on the Maddox was used by President Johnson as an excuse to do what he already wanted to do, expand the war in Vietnam.
9/11 is as dramatic an event as I have witnessed in my life. Who could forget watching the Twin Towers collapse in a heap of rubble?
At the time, I thought to myself it was odd that the towers came straight down. It seemed to me almost as if it was a controlled demolition. But I quickly set that notion aside.
It was only later that I began to read about how qualified people were questioning the narrative that the towers did not collapse because of being hit by airliners, but were, in fact, taken down in a controlled demolition as I thought at the time of the initial attack.
9/11 is a huge topic, well beyond the scope of a single blog post. But if it’s true that the official explanation of the collapse of the World Trade Center is deliberately misleading, we would do well to ask what the purpose of it was. Could it be that 9/11 was designed to galvanize support for the Global War on Terror that followed, more specifically, the attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria as well as the attacks on Americans’ civil liberties that have continued to this day? Who was/is the beneficiary of these actions?
We were told in 2017 that Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad had gassed his own people, a crime that called for US involvement to overthrow the Syrian leader. But there have been credible reports that inspectors found no evidence of Assad’s gassing his fellow Syrians and that the reports stating such were suppressed.
The Syrian Civil War also saw the rise of ISIS, the most feared of all Muslim terrorist groups. But what if I told you that there is good evidence that ISIS was a joint creation of the US and Israel?
This brings us up today, where we have been regaled with stories of the heroic resistance on the part of Volodymyr Zelensky and the Ukrainians against the Russian invasion. Everybody knows that Russia is the bad guy and Zelensky the freedom fighter. But what if this perception created by the MSM is just as false as the other hoaxes already mentioned?
Already, there is plenty of evidence to doubt the narrative that we’re being sold, that a crazed Vladimir Putin attacked Ukraine for no good reason.
In truth, the US overthrew the democratically elected, pro-Russian government of Ukraine in 2014 and installed a US-friendly, anti-Russia regime in its place. Since then, it appears that the US has used Ukraine to wage a proxy war against Russia, both supplying millions of dollars in military equipment as well as training the Ukrainian military to attack ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine, the much talked about Donbass region.
Evidence suggests that the CIA has, in fact, trained these groups, at least some of which are neo-Nazi.
If it seems like a stretch to suggest that the American CIA would be involved with neo-Nazis, this article should put any doubts to rest. It turns out that the CIA was, contrary to US law, smuggling actual Nazis into the US beginning way back in the late 1940s. If they were willing to help Nazis then, why should it surprise anyone if they are willing to train Ukrainian neo-Nazis today?
Further, it appears that the Biden regime wanted the Russians to attack Ukraine. This is clear from the complete refusal of Biden’s diplomats to accede to reasonable Russian demands that Ukraine remain neutral and not become a part of NATO. In fact, not only did the Biden regime not hear Russia, but it also seemed to go out of its way to provoke the Kremlin to invade Ukraine.
Why did Biden refuse any concession to Russia? In his article “The West’s Desperate Effort to Switch the Enemy from Covid to Putin,” Martin Armstrong explains that election politics is at least one reason for Biden’s hard-line with Putin. “Meanwhile, the West has been on its hands and knees begging for Putin to invade Ukraine. They know that rarely will the people throw out of power a government during a war.”
Am I saying that the Democrats would risk WWIII in order to maintain power in the upcoming 2022 mid-terms and the 2024 presidential election?
Yes, that’s exactly what I, and Martin Armstrong, are saying.
Look, the Dems, the Deep State, and the globalists stole the 2020 election to get rid of Trump and install someone friendly to their plans. If they would rig the 2020 election, of course they will try to rig the next election, and the next one., and the next one.
But they won’t be able to use the same tactics they did in 2020. People are on the lookout for that. They need a new wrinkle. A war should do the trick for them.
Could the Democrats’ war gambit cause people to forget all about their Covid tyranny and to pull the lever for them in November?
Maybe.
There likely are other reasons for Biden’s obvious provocation of Russia. An additional likely reason is that the World Economic Forum (WEF) with its globalist hopes to use the war in Ukraine to remove Russia as an impediment to its ambitions. Considering the Pope has close connections with the WEF makes this even more likely.
As Christians, it is imperative that we remember the words of Christ.
Take heed that no man deceive you.
Make a non tax-deductible donation to support the work of Lux Lucet.
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly
“In truth, the US overthrew the democratically elected, pro-Russian government of Ukraine in 2014 and installed a US-friendly, anti-Russia regime in its place. Since then, it appears that the US has used Ukraine to wage a proxy war against Russia, both supplying millions of dollars in military equipment as well as training the Ukrainian military to attack ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine, the much talked about Donbass region.”
A lot of your article is true about these false flags. But this one about Ukraine doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. The Yanukovich gov was a completely corrupt Russian proxy that was overthrown by Ukrainians. The Ukrainians hated him then and he has zero support today. Did they get outside help? Yes, but no one supports him today.
As for the correct narratives about false flags, you must realize that the “attacks on Russians” in Donbass is a RUSSIAN false flag.
I live in the former Soviet Union and these facts are undisputable as are your statements about Pearl Harbor, Tonkin, and 9/11.
Not trying to pick a fight here, brother. But this “Ukraine is a false flag” stuff isn’t true.
Thanks for your commentss. Yanukovich was overthrown with substantial help from the US. State Department official Victoria Nuland was caught on tape picking the new government. Yanukovich, whatever his shortcomings, was the elected leader of Ukraine, whose election was certified as fair by outside observers.
Regarding the cause of the current war in Ukraine, the position of the US government and Western press is that Putin attacked Ukraine for no good reason because he’s a madman, leaving out any reference to the 2014 coup or the eight years of war in Donbass.
The other thing the Western press doesn’t mention is the NATO expansion issue. Many top American foreign policy experts have said for years that NATO expansion into Ukraine was a red line for Russia. But, unfortunately, those who make US foreign policy pursued NATO membership for Ukraine anyway, refusing to take seriously Russia’s legitimate security concerns about NATO (American) military bases on Russia’s borders.